2012Medical Innovation of ChinaRequires access

Clinical Research of Conventional VSD and Improved VSD on Treating Refractory Wounds of the Foot Surgery

Qian Ai-lian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To study the clinical research of conventional Vacuum Sealing Drainage(VSD) and Improved VSD on treating refractory wounds of the hand and foot surgery. Method: 70 patients were randomly divided into treatment group(35 cases) and control group(35 cases). The treatment group was treated by improved VSD, while the control group was treated by conventional VSD. The efficacy and the difference of epithelialization time, healing time, wound healing rate, the fluid drainage bacterial culture positive rate, drainage tube blockage rate, and wound healing rate of the two groups were observed. Result: The total effective rate of the treatment group was 91.18%, the control group was 71.43%, the two groups in clinical curative effect had significant difference(P0.05). The epithelialization time, healing time, were reduced in treatment group than those in the control group(P0.05), while the drainage liquid germiculture positive rate and drainage tube plugging rate of the treatment group were lower than those of control group, but the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion: The improved VSD has obvious effect on refractory wounds of the hand and foot surgery, which can alleviate the problem of clogging of the VSD during treatment, and it’s worthy of clinic application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To study the clinical research of conventional Vacuum Sealing Drainage(VSD) and Improved VSD on treating refractory wounds of the hand and foot surgery. Method: 70 patients were randomly divided into treatment group(35 cases) and control group(35 cases). The treatment group was treated by improved VSD, while the control group was treated by conventional VSD. The efficacy and the difference of epithelialization time, healing time, wound healing rate, the fluid drainage bacterial culture positive rate, drainage tube blockage rate, and wound healing rate of the two groups were observed. Result: The total effective rate of the treatment group was 91.18%, the control group was 71.43%, the two groups in clinical curative effect had significant difference(P0.05). The epithelialization time, healing time, were reduced in treatment group than those in the control group(P0.05), while the drainage liquid germiculture positive rate and drainage tube plugging rate of the treatment group were lower than those of control group, but the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion: The improved VSD has obvious effect on refractory wounds of the hand and foot surgery, which can alleviate the problem of clogging of the VSD during treatment, and it’s worthy of clinic application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To study the clinical research of conventional Vacuum Sealing Drainage(VSD) and Improved VSD on treating refractory wounds of the hand and foot surgery. Method: 70 patients were randomly divided into treatment group(35 cases) and control group(35 cases). The treatment group was treated by improved VSD, while the control group was treated by conventional VSD. The efficacy and the difference of epithelialization time, healing time, wound healing rate, the fluid drainage bacterial culture positive rate, drainage tube blockage rate, and wound healing rate of the two groups were observed. Result: The total effective rate of the treatment group was 91.18%, the control group was 71.43%, the two groups in clinical curative effect had significant difference(P0.05). The epithelialization time, healing time, were reduced in treatment group than those in the control group(P0.05), while the drainage liquid germiculture positive rate and drainage tube plugging rate of the treatment group were lower than those of control group, but the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion: The improved VSD has obvious effect on refractory wounds of the hand and foot surgery, which can alleviate the problem of clogging of the VSD during treatment, and it’s worthy of clinic application.

Key concepts: Medicine, Refractory (planetary science), Surgery, Significant difference, Drainage, Wound healing, Cure rate, Conventional treatment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Research of Conventional VSD and Improved VSD on Treating Refractory Wounds of the Foot Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens