2014•Journal of Changzhou Vocational College of Information TechnologyRequires access

Discussion on Rejecting Academic Misconduct of Academic Journals

Liu Shao-bi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Facing the current common academic misconduct such as plagiarism,it is necessary to establish a long-term mechanism in which all sectors of society work collaboratively,improve the evaluation system of scientific achievements,and advocate academic ethic construction. It is also essential to strengthen the self-discipline of academic journal industry and stick to professional ethics of academic journal. Journal editors should improve themselves and improve their sense of responsibilities and strictly detect proportion of plagiarism. There should be both punishment and prevention,and stress should be put on prevention,so that to minimize the academic misconduct.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Facing the current common academic misconduct such as plagiarism,it is necessary to establish a long-term mechanism in which all sectors of society work collaboratively,improve the evaluation system of scientific achievements,and advocate academic ethic construction. It is also essential to strengthen the self-discipline of academic journal industry and stick to professional ethics of academic journal. Journal editors should improve themselves and improve their sense of responsibilities and strictly detect proportion of plagiarism. There should be both punishment and prevention,and stress should be put on prevention,so that to minimize the academic misconduct.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Facing the current common academic misconduct such as plagiarism,it is necessary to establish a long-term mechanism in which all sectors of society work collaboratively,improve the evaluation system of scientific achievements,and advocate academic ethic construction. It is also essential to strengthen the self-discipline of academic journal industry and stick to professional ethics of academic journal. Journal editors should improve themselves and improve their sense of responsibilities and strictly detect proportion of plagiarism. There should be both punishment and prevention,and stress should be put on prevention,so that to minimize the academic misconduct.

Key concepts: Misconduct, Scientific misconduct, Punishment (psychology), Academic integrity, Engineering ethics, Ethical issues, Work (physics), Learning development

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discussion on Rejecting Academic Misconduct of Academic Journals — Research Paper | ScholarLens