Discussion on Rejecting Academic Misconduct of Academic Journals
Liu Shao-bi
Abstract
Liu Shao-bi
Abstract
Facing the current common academic misconduct such as plagiarism,it is necessary to establish a long-term mechanism in which all sectors of society work collaboratively,improve the evaluation system of scientific achievements,and advocate academic ethic construction. It is also essential to strengthen the self-discipline of academic journal industry and stick to professional ethics of academic journal. Journal editors should improve themselves and improve their sense of responsibilities and strictly detect proportion of plagiarism. There should be both punishment and prevention,and stress should be put on prevention,so that to minimize the academic misconduct.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Facing the current common academic misconduct such as plagiarism,it is necessary to establish a long-term mechanism in which all sectors of society work collaboratively,improve the evaluation system of scientific achievements,and advocate academic ethic construction. It is also essential to strengthen the self-discipline of academic journal industry and stick to professional ethics of academic journal. Journal editors should improve themselves and improve their sense of responsibilities and strictly detect proportion of plagiarism. There should be both punishment and prevention,and stress should be put on prevention,so that to minimize the academic misconduct.
Key concepts: Misconduct, Scientific misconduct, Punishment (psychology), Academic integrity, Engineering ethics, Ethical issues, Work (physics), Learning development