Probing Into the legal Application of the Right of Priority in Being Paid the Construction Fund
Li Yan
Abstract
Li Yan
Abstract
The promulgation of Article 286 of the Contract Law causes lots of disputes. Knowledge of the nature of the related right is connected with its protection. It should be explained as the right of priority in accordance with the related judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court which provides it prior to mortgage and other credits. Such right of priority possesses the nature of the real right for security, whose characteristics of attachment, retroactivity, subrogation and undivision become the theoretical basis of solving problems in adjudication. For this reason, the authors propose their opinions to those problems emerging in the adjudication.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The promulgation of Article 286 of the Contract Law causes lots of disputes. Knowledge of the nature of the related right is connected with its protection. It should be explained as the right of priority in accordance with the related judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court which provides it prior to mortgage and other credits. Such right of priority possesses the nature of the real right for security, whose characteristics of attachment, retroactivity, subrogation and undivision become the theoretical basis of solving problems in adjudication. For this reason, the authors propose their opinions to those problems emerging in the adjudication.
Key concepts: Promulgation, Adjudication, Subrogation, Interpretation (philosophy), Law, Supreme court, Judicial interpretation, Business