International Cooperation Study:Contestation from Schools,Achievements and Limits
Qin Huiyin
Abstract
Qin Huiyin
Abstract
It has been 30 years since the emergence of international cooperation study.This essay is a comparison of the international cooperation theories from the three main IR schools—neorealism,neoliberal institutionalism and constructionism,specifically,how they set their hypothesises and consequently define national interest and then deduce their explanations of international cooperation.The shared knowledge from the three schools is mentioned as well.Examining the limits of the three cooperation theories,it is suggested to construct a comprehensive explanation model which imbibes the strength of perspective of power,cognition or institution.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It has been 30 years since the emergence of international cooperation study.This essay is a comparison of the international cooperation theories from the three main IR schools—neorealism,neoliberal institutionalism and constructionism,specifically,how they set their hypothesises and consequently define national interest and then deduce their explanations of international cooperation.The shared knowledge from the three schools is mentioned as well.Examining the limits of the three cooperation theories,it is suggested to construct a comprehensive explanation model which imbibes the strength of perspective of power,cognition or institution.
Key concepts: Neorealism (international relations), Construct (python library), Institutionalism, Institution, Perspective (graphical), Epistemology, Power (physics), Set (abstract data type)