2007Wuhan University JournalRequires access

International Cooperation Study:Contestation from Schools,Achievements and Limits

Qin Huiyin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It has been 30 years since the emergence of international cooperation study.This essay is a comparison of the international cooperation theories from the three main IR schools—neorealism,neoliberal institutionalism and constructionism,specifically,how they set their hypothesises and consequently define national interest and then deduce their explanations of international cooperation.The shared knowledge from the three schools is mentioned as well.Examining the limits of the three cooperation theories,it is suggested to construct a comprehensive explanation model which imbibes the strength of perspective of power,cognition or institution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has been 30 years since the emergence of international cooperation study.This essay is a comparison of the international cooperation theories from the three main IR schools—neorealism,neoliberal institutionalism and constructionism,specifically,how they set their hypothesises and consequently define national interest and then deduce their explanations of international cooperation.The shared knowledge from the three schools is mentioned as well.Examining the limits of the three cooperation theories,it is suggested to construct a comprehensive explanation model which imbibes the strength of perspective of power,cognition or institution.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has been 30 years since the emergence of international cooperation study.This essay is a comparison of the international cooperation theories from the three main IR schools—neorealism,neoliberal institutionalism and constructionism,specifically,how they set their hypothesises and consequently define national interest and then deduce their explanations of international cooperation.The shared knowledge from the three schools is mentioned as well.Examining the limits of the three cooperation theories,it is suggested to construct a comprehensive explanation model which imbibes the strength of perspective of power,cognition or institution.

Key concepts: Neorealism (international relations), Construct (python library), Institutionalism, Institution, Perspective (graphical), Epistemology, Power (physics), Set (abstract data type)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
International Cooperation Study:Contestation from Schools,Achievements and Limits — Research Paper | ScholarLens