2009•Chinese Medicine of Factory and MineRequires access

Cost-effectiveness analysis of two therapeutic regimen of Helicobacter pylori eradication

Jiang You-f

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze cost-effectiveness of two different therapeutic regimen to treat H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer.Methods Eighty-two patients with peptic ulcer were randomized divided into two groups:group A(received esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1000 mg and furazolidone 100 mg, twice a day) and group B(received omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1000 mg and furazolidone 100 mg, twice a day).The courses of the two treatment were all 7 days. The cure rates of peptic ulcer and eradication rate of H. pylori were observed, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed in each group 4 weeks after treatment.Results Cure rates of peptic ulcer in group A and group B had significant difference(95.12% vs 85.37%,P0.05).Eradication rates of H. pylori had no significant difference in group A and B (92.68% vs 85.37%,P0.05).Average treatment cost per case was 209.25 yuan in group A and 82.41 yuan in group B. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ulcer healing rate and Hp eradication rate of group A was 17.35,13.01 as against group B.Conclusions According to the cost-effectiveness analysis,triple therapy consisting of omeprazole is more cost effective than the triple therapy consisting of esomeprazole.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze cost-effectiveness of two different therapeutic regimen to treat H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer.Methods Eighty-two patients with peptic ulcer were randomized divided into two groups:group A(received esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1000 mg and furazolidone 100 mg, twice a day) and group B(received omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1000 mg and furazolidone 100 mg, twice a day).The courses of the two treatment were all 7 days. The cure rates of peptic ulcer and eradication rate of H. pylori were observed, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed in each group 4 weeks after treatment.Results Cure rates of peptic ulcer in group A and group B had significant difference(95.12% vs 85.37%,P0.05).Eradication rates of H. pylori had no significant difference in group A and B (92.68% vs 85.37%,P0.05).Average treatment cost per case was 209.25 yuan in group A and 82.41 yuan in group B. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ulcer healing rate and Hp eradication rate of group A was 17.35,13.01 as against group B.Conclusions According to the cost-effectiveness analysis,triple therapy consisting of omeprazole is more cost effective than the triple therapy consisting of esomeprazole.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze cost-effectiveness of two different therapeutic regimen to treat H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer.Methods Eighty-two patients with peptic ulcer were randomized divided into two groups:group A(received esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1000 mg and furazolidone 100 mg, twice a day) and group B(received omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1000 mg and furazolidone 100 mg, twice a day).The courses of the two treatment were all 7 days. The cure rates of peptic ulcer and eradication rate of H. pylori were observed, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed in each group 4 weeks after treatment.Results Cure rates of peptic ulcer in group A and group B had significant difference(95.12% vs 85.37%,P0.05).Eradication rates of H. pylori had no significant difference in group A and B (92.68% vs 85.37%,P0.05).Average treatment cost per case was 209.25 yuan in group A and 82.41 yuan in group B. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ulcer healing rate and Hp eradication rate of group A was 17.35,13.01 as against group B.Conclusions According to the cost-effectiveness analysis,triple therapy consisting of omeprazole is more cost effective than the triple therapy consisting of esomeprazole.

Key concepts: Esomeprazole, Furazolidone, Medicine, Helicobacter pylori, Amoxicillin, Omeprazole, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-effectiveness analysis of two therapeutic regimen of Helicobacter pylori eradication — Research Paper | ScholarLens