2003Journal of Lanzhou UniversityRequires access

On the Responsibility System of Ancient China's Legal Officials

Qi Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The author argues that the responsibility system of ancient China's legal officials started in the Xia, Shang and Zhou Dynasties, developed in the Qin and Han Dynasties, improved in Tang and further perfected in Ming and Qing Dynasties, and that it is characterized by pragmatism, rationalism, legal cultivation of officials rather than civilians, full awareness of the significance of the law, and lack of litigation, which all make up the core of ancient China's legal system and the theoretical foundation for further reform.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author argues that the responsibility system of ancient China's legal officials started in the Xia, Shang and Zhou Dynasties, developed in the Qin and Han Dynasties, improved in Tang and further perfected in Ming and Qing Dynasties, and that it is characterized by pragmatism, rationalism, legal cultivation of officials rather than civilians, full awareness of the significance of the law, and lack of litigation, which all make up the core of ancient China's legal system and the theoretical foundation for further reform.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author argues that the responsibility system of ancient China's legal officials started in the Xia, Shang and Zhou Dynasties, developed in the Qin and Han Dynasties, improved in Tang and further perfected in Ming and Qing Dynasties, and that it is characterized by pragmatism, rationalism, legal cultivation of officials rather than civilians, full awareness of the significance of the law, and lack of litigation, which all make up the core of ancient China's legal system and the theoretical foundation for further reform.

Key concepts: China, Pragmatism, Law, Foundation (evidence), History of China, Rationalism, Legal realism, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Responsibility System of Ancient China's Legal Officials — Research Paper | ScholarLens