2011Zhongguo yaofangRequires access

Efficacy Comparison of Ursodeoxycholic Acid and Hydroxymethylnicotinamide in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Complicating with Intrahepatic Cholestasis

Zhao Yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe therapeutic efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid and hydroxymethylnicotinamide in the treatment of chronic cholestatic hepatitis B. METHODS: In this trial, 96 patients with chronic cholestatic hepatitis B were randomly divided into ursodeoxycholic acid group(n=56) and hydroxymethylnicotinamide group(n=40). Ursodeoxycholic acid group received ursodeoxycholic acid for 4 weeks, and hydroxymethylnicotin group received hydroxymethylnicotinamide for 4 weeks. Clinical efficacy was evaluated two-week and four-week after treatment. RESULTS: After two-week treatment, the indicators of liver function had improved in both groups, but there was no statistical difference in the reduction of total bilirubin, bilirubin direct and placental alkaline phosphatase between 2 groups (P0.05). After four-week treatment, the decrease of liver function indicators in ursodeoxycholic acid group were more significant than in hydroxymethylnicotin group, there was statistical significance (P0.05). Effective rate of ursodeoxycholic acid group was significantly higher than that of hydroxymethylnicotin group(75% vs. 70%, P=0.02).CONCLUSION: Ursodeoxycholic acid has better efficacy than hydroxymethylnicotinamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B complicating with intrahepatic cholestasis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To observe therapeutic efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid and hydroxymethylnicotinamide in the treatment of chronic cholestatic hepatitis B. METHODS: In this trial, 96 patients with chronic cholestatic hepatitis B were randomly divided into ursodeoxycholic acid group(n=56) and hydroxymethylnicotinamide group(n=40). Ursodeoxycholic acid group received ursodeoxycholic acid for 4 weeks, and hydroxymethylnicotin group received hydroxymethylnicotinamide for 4 weeks. Clinical efficacy was evaluated two-week and four-week after treatment. RESULTS: After two-week treatment, the indicators of liver function had improved in both groups, but there was no statistical difference in the reduction of total bilirubin, bilirubin direct and placental alkaline phosphatase between 2 groups (P0.05). After four-week treatment, the decrease of liver function indicators in ursodeoxycholic acid group were more significant than in hydroxymethylnicotin group, there was statistical significance (P0.05). Effective rate of ursodeoxycholic acid group was significantly higher than that of hydroxymethylnicotin group(75% vs. 70%, P=0.02).CONCLUSION: Ursodeoxycholic acid has better efficacy than hydroxymethylnicotinamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B complicating with intrahepatic cholestasis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe therapeutic efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid and hydroxymethylnicotinamide in the treatment of chronic cholestatic hepatitis B. METHODS: In this trial, 96 patients with chronic cholestatic hepatitis B were randomly divided into ursodeoxycholic acid group(n=56) and hydroxymethylnicotinamide group(n=40). Ursodeoxycholic acid group received ursodeoxycholic acid for 4 weeks, and hydroxymethylnicotin group received hydroxymethylnicotinamide for 4 weeks. Clinical efficacy was evaluated two-week and four-week after treatment. RESULTS: After two-week treatment, the indicators of liver function had improved in both groups, but there was no statistical difference in the reduction of total bilirubin, bilirubin direct and placental alkaline phosphatase between 2 groups (P0.05). After four-week treatment, the decrease of liver function indicators in ursodeoxycholic acid group were more significant than in hydroxymethylnicotin group, there was statistical significance (P0.05). Effective rate of ursodeoxycholic acid group was significantly higher than that of hydroxymethylnicotin group(75% vs. 70%, P=0.02).CONCLUSION: Ursodeoxycholic acid has better efficacy than hydroxymethylnicotinamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B complicating with intrahepatic cholestasis.

Key concepts: Ursodeoxycholic acid, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Cholestatic hepatitis, Cholestasis, Liver function, Chronic hepatitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy Comparison of Ursodeoxycholic Acid and Hydroxymethylnicotinamide in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Complicating with Intrahepatic Cholestasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens