2006•Medical Journal of Chinese People's HealthRequires access

A comparative study of maprotiline plus fiuoxetine in treatment of depression.

Deng Lihong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of maprotiline plus fluoxetine for the depressive patients.Methods:A controlled study was carried out between 61 patients who met the CCMD-3 criteriaon of major depression.The 31 of total patients were treated with maprotiline plus fluoxetine(therapeutic group) and the others were treated with fluoxetine(control group) for 6 weeks.The efficacy was assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD) and the safety was assessed by Rating Scale for Side Effects(SERS).Results: After 6 weeks treatment,the efficacy rate of the therapeutic group and control group were 84% and 77%,respectively.The results have no remarkable differences in two groups(P0.05),but therapeutic group's convalescing rate achieved 65% and the control group 37%,The results have remarkable differences in two groups(P0.05).and the therapeutic group took effect more quickly.Conclusions: maprotiline plus fluoxetine is an appropriate method in treatment of depression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of maprotiline plus fluoxetine for the depressive patients.Methods:A controlled study was carried out between 61 patients who met the CCMD-3 criteriaon of major depression.The 31 of total patients were treated with maprotiline plus fluoxetine(therapeutic group) and the others were treated with fluoxetine(control group) for 6 weeks.The efficacy was assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD) and the safety was assessed by Rating Scale for Side Effects(SERS).Results: After 6 weeks treatment,the efficacy rate of the therapeutic group and control group were 84% and 77%,respectively.The results have no remarkable differences in two groups(P0.05),but therapeutic group's convalescing rate achieved 65% and the control group 37%,The results have remarkable differences in two groups(P0.05).and the therapeutic group took effect more quickly.Conclusions: maprotiline plus fluoxetine is an appropriate method in treatment of depression.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of maprotiline plus fluoxetine for the depressive patients.Methods:A controlled study was carried out between 61 patients who met the CCMD-3 criteriaon of major depression.The 31 of total patients were treated with maprotiline plus fluoxetine(therapeutic group) and the others were treated with fluoxetine(control group) for 6 weeks.The efficacy was assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD) and the safety was assessed by Rating Scale for Side Effects(SERS).Results: After 6 weeks treatment,the efficacy rate of the therapeutic group and control group were 84% and 77%,respectively.The results have no remarkable differences in two groups(P0.05),but therapeutic group's convalescing rate achieved 65% and the control group 37%,The results have remarkable differences in two groups(P0.05).and the therapeutic group took effect more quickly.Conclusions: maprotiline plus fluoxetine is an appropriate method in treatment of depression.

Key concepts: Maprotiline, Hamd, Fluoxetine, Depression (economics), Therapeutic effect, Medicine, Rating scale, Clinical efficacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of maprotiline plus fiuoxetine in treatment of depression. — Research Paper | ScholarLens