2006•PubMedRequires access

[Application of allogeneic bone in surgical treatment of benign bone neoplasm].

Ji Li, Zhiqiang Wang, Yumin Zhang, Huiping Song, Lin Yuan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of allogeneic bone grafting for bone defect resulting from benign neoplasm resection and discuss the clinical application and bone defect repair mechanisms of allogeneic bone. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 135 patients with benign neoplasm resection who received bone defect filling with the allogeneic bone graft. RESULTS: In the 104 patients with complete clinical follow-up data, 96 achieved bone union, 7 experienced relapses to require surgical intervention and 1 had severe infection to lead to failure of the operation. The mean time for bone union was 9.7 months, and during the follow-up, no viral disease in relation to the graft was found after surgery. CONCLUSION: Bone defect filling with allogeneic bone graft can be simple and safe in comparison with that with autograft or other biomaterials, and the bone healing time, infection rate and local tumor recurrence can be comparable with the autograft.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of allogeneic bone grafting for bone defect resulting from benign neoplasm resection and discuss the clinical application and bone defect repair mechanisms of allogeneic bone. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 135 patients with benign neoplasm resection who received bone defect filling with the allogeneic bone graft. RESULTS: In the 104 patients with complete clinical follow-up data, 96 achieved bone union, 7 experienced relapses to require surgical intervention and 1 had severe infection to lead to failure of the operation. The mean time for bone union was 9.7 months, and during the follow-up, no viral disease in relation to the graft was found after surgery. CONCLUSION: Bone defect filling with allogeneic bone graft can be simple and safe in comparison with that with autograft or other biomaterials, and the bone healing time, infection rate and local tumor recurrence can be comparable with the autograft.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of allogeneic bone grafting for bone defect resulting from benign neoplasm resection and discuss the clinical application and bone defect repair mechanisms of allogeneic bone. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 135 patients with benign neoplasm resection who received bone defect filling with the allogeneic bone graft. RESULTS: In the 104 patients with complete clinical follow-up data, 96 achieved bone union, 7 experienced relapses to require surgical intervention and 1 had severe infection to lead to failure of the operation. The mean time for bone union was 9.7 months, and during the follow-up, no viral disease in relation to the graft was found after surgery. CONCLUSION: Bone defect filling with allogeneic bone graft can be simple and safe in comparison with that with autograft or other biomaterials, and the bone healing time, infection rate and local tumor recurrence can be comparable with the autograft.

Key concepts: Medicine, Bone grafting, Surgery, Neoplasm, Bone healing, Retrospective cohort study, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Application of allogeneic bone in surgical treatment of benign bone neoplasm]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens