2012•China Foreign Medical TreatmentRequires access

Comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and traditional open cholecystectomy

Gang Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To probe clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) and traditional open cholecystectomy(OC). Methods 104 patients with benign gallbladder disease were divided LC group(74 cases) and OC group(70 cases). The operative and postoperative complications of two groups were observed and compared. Results There were significant difference in operation time,volume of blood loss during operation,length ofincision,gastrointestinalfunction restoring time,postoperative use of analgesics and hospital stay between two groups. In LC group, infections ofincision in 1 patient;In OC group, infections ofincisional wound in 5 patients,and local hematoma ofincision in 2 patients. The rate of complications was lower in LC group than these in OC group. Conclusion LC has strong points of slight damage,postoperative quick recovery and less complications,and is optimal operation for benign gallbladder disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To probe clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) and traditional open cholecystectomy(OC). Methods 104 patients with benign gallbladder disease were divided LC group(74 cases) and OC group(70 cases). The operative and postoperative complications of two groups were observed and compared. Results There were significant difference in operation time,volume of blood loss during operation,length ofincision,gastrointestinalfunction restoring time,postoperative use of analgesics and hospital stay between two groups. In LC group, infections ofincision in 1 patient;In OC group, infections ofincisional wound in 5 patients,and local hematoma ofincision in 2 patients. The rate of complications was lower in LC group than these in OC group. Conclusion LC has strong points of slight damage,postoperative quick recovery and less complications,and is optimal operation for benign gallbladder disease.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To probe clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) and traditional open cholecystectomy(OC). Methods 104 patients with benign gallbladder disease were divided LC group(74 cases) and OC group(70 cases). The operative and postoperative complications of two groups were observed and compared. Results There were significant difference in operation time,volume of blood loss during operation,length ofincision,gastrointestinalfunction restoring time,postoperative use of analgesics and hospital stay between two groups. In LC group, infections ofincision in 1 patient;In OC group, infections ofincisional wound in 5 patients,and local hematoma ofincision in 2 patients. The rate of complications was lower in LC group than these in OC group. Conclusion LC has strong points of slight damage,postoperative quick recovery and less complications,and is optimal operation for benign gallbladder disease.

Key concepts: Medicine, Open cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Cholecystectomy, Surgery, Gallbladder, Hematoma, Blood loss

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and traditional open cholecystectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens