2013Hainan yixueRequires access

Comparison on the short-term efficacy of phacoemulsification surgery and small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery in senile cataract

Xue Yua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the short-term efficacy of phacoemulsification surgery and small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery in senile cataract. Methods Sixty patients with senile cataract were divided into the observation group (treated by small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery) and the control group (treated by phacoemulsification cataract surgery), with 30 cases in each group. The curative effect and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The intraocular pressure 12 h, 24 h after operation in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P0.05). The postoperative visual acuity of two groups one day, one week, one month after operation were significantly higher than those before the operation (P0.05), with no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Postoperative complications of two groups showed no significant difference (P0.05). Astigmatism one day after operation in the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (P0.05), while that one week and one month after operation showed no significant difference (P0.05). Operation cost in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group (P0.05). Conclusion Small incision non-phacoemulsification easily leads to increased intraocular pressure after surgery, but the curative effect is similar with ultrasonic emulsification operation, with less cost, which is suitable for primary hospital.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the short-term efficacy of phacoemulsification surgery and small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery in senile cataract. Methods Sixty patients with senile cataract were divided into the observation group (treated by small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery) and the control group (treated by phacoemulsification cataract surgery), with 30 cases in each group. The curative effect and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The intraocular pressure 12 h, 24 h after operation in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P0.05). The postoperative visual acuity of two groups one day, one week, one month after operation were significantly higher than those before the operation (P0.05), with no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Postoperative complications of two groups showed no significant difference (P0.05). Astigmatism one day after operation in the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (P0.05), while that one week and one month after operation showed no significant difference (P0.05). Operation cost in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group (P0.05). Conclusion Small incision non-phacoemulsification easily leads to increased intraocular pressure after surgery, but the curative effect is similar with ultrasonic emulsification operation, with less cost, which is suitable for primary hospital.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the short-term efficacy of phacoemulsification surgery and small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery in senile cataract. Methods Sixty patients with senile cataract were divided into the observation group (treated by small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery) and the control group (treated by phacoemulsification cataract surgery), with 30 cases in each group. The curative effect and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The intraocular pressure 12 h, 24 h after operation in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P0.05). The postoperative visual acuity of two groups one day, one week, one month after operation were significantly higher than those before the operation (P0.05), with no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Postoperative complications of two groups showed no significant difference (P0.05). Astigmatism one day after operation in the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (P0.05), while that one week and one month after operation showed no significant difference (P0.05). Operation cost in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group (P0.05). Conclusion Small incision non-phacoemulsification easily leads to increased intraocular pressure after surgery, but the curative effect is similar with ultrasonic emulsification operation, with less cost, which is suitable for primary hospital.

Key concepts: Phacoemulsification, Medicine, Senile cataract, Surgery, Significant difference, Astigmatism, Cataract surgery, Intraocular pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison on the short-term efficacy of phacoemulsification surgery and small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery in senile cataract — Research Paper | ScholarLens