2012Yuanshengtai minzu wenhua xuekanRequires access

Review of Eco-anthropology Research in the United States of America

Han Zhao-qing

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the 1960s and 1970s, eco-anthropology was defined as a sub-discipline of cultural anthropology, attracting attentions increasingly. In the 1980s, in order to facilitate its research, some scholars divided the discipline into three stages. The first stage were cultural ecology proposed by Julian Stewart and cultural evolution by Lester Wright, who tried to explore the adaptation of culture in concerned ecological environments; the second stage was the forming of the argument of neo-evolutionism and neo-functionalism, which were influenced by systemism and absorbed the new concepts of dynamic equilibrium, enriching the theories of eco-anthropology; in response to the deficiencies of the neo-evolutionism and neo-functionalism, and in order to improve the early studies by Steward and White, some scholars proposed the theory of processual eco-anthropology, which can be regarded as the third stage of the development of eco-anthropology. From the 1990s, anthropologists have been more positive on environmental issues and have been further expanding the research of eco-anthropology, leading to the rise of environmental anthropology. It is concluded that the new-born environmental anthropology is the extension of traditional eco-anthropology as well as a trend of traditional eco-anthropology development.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the 1960s and 1970s, eco-anthropology was defined as a sub-discipline of cultural anthropology, attracting attentions increasingly. In the 1980s, in order to facilitate its research, some scholars divided the discipline into three stages. The first stage were cultural ecology proposed by Julian Stewart and cultural evolution by Lester Wright, who tried to explore the adaptation of culture in concerned ecological environments; the second stage was the forming of the argument of neo-evolutionism and neo-functionalism, which were influenced by systemism and absorbed the new concepts of dynamic equilibrium, enriching the theories of eco-anthropology; in response to the deficiencies of the neo-evolutionism and neo-functionalism, and in order to improve the early studies by Steward and White, some scholars proposed the theory of processual eco-anthropology, which can be regarded as the third stage of the development of eco-anthropology. From the 1990s, anthropologists have been more positive on environmental issues and have been further expanding the research of eco-anthropology, leading to the rise of environmental anthropology. It is concluded that the new-born environmental anthropology is the extension of traditional eco-anthropology as well as a trend of traditional eco-anthropology development.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the 1960s and 1970s, eco-anthropology was defined as a sub-discipline of cultural anthropology, attracting attentions increasingly. In the 1980s, in order to facilitate its research, some scholars divided the discipline into three stages. The first stage were cultural ecology proposed by Julian Stewart and cultural evolution by Lester Wright, who tried to explore the adaptation of culture in concerned ecological environments; the second stage was the forming of the argument of neo-evolutionism and neo-functionalism, which were influenced by systemism and absorbed the new concepts of dynamic equilibrium, enriching the theories of eco-anthropology; in response to the deficiencies of the neo-evolutionism and neo-functionalism, and in order to improve the early studies by Steward and White, some scholars proposed the theory of processual eco-anthropology, which can be regarded as the third stage of the development of eco-anthropology. From the 1990s, anthropologists have been more positive on environmental issues and have been further expanding the research of eco-anthropology, leading to the rise of environmental anthropology. It is concluded that the new-born environmental anthropology is the extension of traditional eco-anthropology as well as a trend of traditional eco-anthropology development.

Key concepts: Sociocultural anthropology, Evolutionism, Ecological anthropology, Applied anthropology, Functionalism (philosophy of mind), Anthropology, Sociology, Cultural anthropology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Review of Eco-anthropology Research in the United States of America — Research Paper | ScholarLens