2007Zhongguo redai yixueRequires access

Comparison of cost-effectiveness between matrine and interferon in treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

Tang Gui-lian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To make pharmacoeconmics evaluation of matrine and Interferonα-1βin treatment of chronic hepatitis B and to offer optimum schedule for clinical treatment.Methods Sixty-three chronic hepatitis B patients were randomly divided in- to treatment and control groups.Though pharmacoeconmic cost-effectiveness analysis,the cost and efficacy of interferona-1βwas compared with matrine in treatment of 63 chronic hepatitis B.Results The effective rates of matrine and interferonα-1βwere 70.97% and 71.83%(P>0.05);the cost-effectiveness ratios were 57.20 and 91.58 respectively(P<0.05).cost-effective- ness ratios obtained by sensitivity analysis were 45.76 and 73.26 respectively.Conclusion Matrine is more economical than Inter- feronα-1βin treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To make pharmacoeconmics evaluation of matrine and Interferonα-1βin treatment of chronic hepatitis B and to offer optimum schedule for clinical treatment.Methods Sixty-three chronic hepatitis B patients were randomly divided in- to treatment and control groups.Though pharmacoeconmic cost-effectiveness analysis,the cost and efficacy of interferona-1βwas compared with matrine in treatment of 63 chronic hepatitis B.Results The effective rates of matrine and interferonα-1βwere 70.97% and 71.83%(P>0.05);the cost-effectiveness ratios were 57.20 and 91.58 respectively(P<0.05).cost-effective- ness ratios obtained by sensitivity analysis were 45.76 and 73.26 respectively.Conclusion Matrine is more economical than Inter- feronα-1βin treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To make pharmacoeconmics evaluation of matrine and Interferonα-1βin treatment of chronic hepatitis B and to offer optimum schedule for clinical treatment.Methods Sixty-three chronic hepatitis B patients were randomly divided in- to treatment and control groups.Though pharmacoeconmic cost-effectiveness analysis,the cost and efficacy of interferona-1βwas compared with matrine in treatment of 63 chronic hepatitis B.Results The effective rates of matrine and interferonα-1βwere 70.97% and 71.83%(P>0.05);the cost-effectiveness ratios were 57.20 and 91.58 respectively(P<0.05).cost-effective- ness ratios obtained by sensitivity analysis were 45.76 and 73.26 respectively.Conclusion Matrine is more economical than Inter- feronα-1βin treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients.

Key concepts: Matrine, Medicine, Chronic hepatitis, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Interferon, Cost effectiveness, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of cost-effectiveness between matrine and interferon in treatment of chronic hepatitis B. — Research Paper | ScholarLens