2009•Pharmaceutical Care and ResearchRequires access

Cost-minimization analysis of sequential therapy of urinary system infection with levofloxacin

JI Jian-ming

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate cost-effectiveness of two therapeutic schemes of levofloxacin in the treatment of urinary system infection.Methods: Seventy seven patients with urinary system infection were randomly divided into 2 groups.One group(treatment group) took the sequential therapy with levofloxacin and the other(control group) took pure injection of levofloxacin.Therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reaction(ADR) were observed and a cost-minimization analysis was performed for the 2 groups.Results: There were no significant differences between 2 groups in therapeutic effectiveness,bacterial clearance and incidence of ADR(P0.05).The cost of treatment group and control group were 172.14 yuan and 353.50 yuan,respectively.The cost-effectiveness ratios of 2 groups were 187.31 and 372.11,respectively.Conclusion: Sequential therapy with levofloxacin was better than pure injection in the treatment of urinary system infection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate cost-effectiveness of two therapeutic schemes of levofloxacin in the treatment of urinary system infection.Methods: Seventy seven patients with urinary system infection were randomly divided into 2 groups.One group(treatment group) took the sequential therapy with levofloxacin and the other(control group) took pure injection of levofloxacin.Therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reaction(ADR) were observed and a cost-minimization analysis was performed for the 2 groups.Results: There were no significant differences between 2 groups in therapeutic effectiveness,bacterial clearance and incidence of ADR(P0.05).The cost of treatment group and control group were 172.14 yuan and 353.50 yuan,respectively.The cost-effectiveness ratios of 2 groups were 187.31 and 372.11,respectively.Conclusion: Sequential therapy with levofloxacin was better than pure injection in the treatment of urinary system infection.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate cost-effectiveness of two therapeutic schemes of levofloxacin in the treatment of urinary system infection.Methods: Seventy seven patients with urinary system infection were randomly divided into 2 groups.One group(treatment group) took the sequential therapy with levofloxacin and the other(control group) took pure injection of levofloxacin.Therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reaction(ADR) were observed and a cost-minimization analysis was performed for the 2 groups.Results: There were no significant differences between 2 groups in therapeutic effectiveness,bacterial clearance and incidence of ADR(P0.05).The cost of treatment group and control group were 172.14 yuan and 353.50 yuan,respectively.The cost-effectiveness ratios of 2 groups were 187.31 and 372.11,respectively.Conclusion: Sequential therapy with levofloxacin was better than pure injection in the treatment of urinary system infection.

Key concepts: Levofloxacin, Cost-minimization analysis, Medicine, Urinary system, Incidence (geometry), Drug, Adverse effect, Urinary infection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-minimization analysis of sequential therapy of urinary system infection with levofloxacin — Research Paper | ScholarLens