2002Chinese Heart JournalRequires access

A comparative study of cardiovascular effects of general anesthesia and combined anesthesia of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine

Li Hou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To make a comparative study of cardiovascular effect of general anesthesia and combined anesthesia of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine. METHODS: 40 patients scheduled for elective whole gastrectomy with ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ, which were randomly divided into GA (general anesthesia) group ( n =20) and CGA (combined general anesthesia) group ( n =20), received general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and combined anesthesia of general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine. Changes in blood pressure and heart rate during the period of anesthesia induction, operation and awake were recorded. RESULTS: ①Changes of systolic blood pressure and heart rate during operation in CGA group were smaller than in GA group (123±14 mm Hg vs 132±17 mm Hg and 78±10/min vs 85±10 min -1 respectively, P 0.01). ② Blood pressure and heart rate changes to intubation and awake were smaller in CGA group than in GA group ( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined anesthesia of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine when applied to whole gastrectomy could maintain more stable hemodynamics compared with general anesthesia, especially suitable to surgical patients having or being predisposing to have myocardial ischemia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To make a comparative study of cardiovascular effect of general anesthesia and combined anesthesia of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine. METHODS: 40 patients scheduled for elective whole gastrectomy with ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ, which were randomly divided into GA (general anesthesia) group ( n =20) and CGA (combined general anesthesia) group ( n =20), received general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and combined anesthesia of general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine. Changes in blood pressure and heart rate during the period of anesthesia induction, operation and awake were recorded. RESULTS: ①Changes of systolic blood pressure and heart rate during operation in CGA group were smaller than in GA group (123±14 mm Hg vs 132±17 mm Hg and 78±10/min vs 85±10 min -1 respectively, P 0.01). ② Blood pressure and heart rate changes to intubation and awake were smaller in CGA group than in GA group ( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined anesthesia of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine when applied to whole gastrectomy could maintain more stable hemodynamics compared with general anesthesia, especially suitable to surgical patients having or being predisposing to have myocardial ischemia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To make a comparative study of cardiovascular effect of general anesthesia and combined anesthesia of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine. METHODS: 40 patients scheduled for elective whole gastrectomy with ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ, which were randomly divided into GA (general anesthesia) group ( n =20) and CGA (combined general anesthesia) group ( n =20), received general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and combined anesthesia of general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine. Changes in blood pressure and heart rate during the period of anesthesia induction, operation and awake were recorded. RESULTS: ①Changes of systolic blood pressure and heart rate during operation in CGA group were smaller than in GA group (123±14 mm Hg vs 132±17 mm Hg and 78±10/min vs 85±10 min -1 respectively, P 0.01). ② Blood pressure and heart rate changes to intubation and awake were smaller in CGA group than in GA group ( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined anesthesia of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine when applied to whole gastrectomy could maintain more stable hemodynamics compared with general anesthesia, especially suitable to surgical patients having or being predisposing to have myocardial ischemia.

Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Ropivacaine, Intubation, Blood pressure, Heart rate, Tracheal intubation, Hemodynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of cardiovascular effects of general anesthesia and combined anesthesia of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural blockade with ropivacaine — Research Paper | ScholarLens