A clinical study of Ursofalk and artificial liver on chronic severe hepatitis
Da-kang Han
Abstract
Da-kang Han
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ursofalk (UDCA) and artificial liver support system in treatment of chronic severe hepatitis. Methods 64 patients with chronic severe hepatitis were randomly divided into two groups : the treated group of 32 cases and the control group of 32 cases. The treatment group was treated with Ursofalk and artificial support systems in addition to conventional therapy. The control group was only treated with conventional therapy. Results In treated group, liver functions of the patients improved significantly ( P 0.05). The markedly effective rate at 4 weeks was 46.9% , effective rate was 25.0% , and the total effective rate was 71.9% . There was significant difference between the two groups ( P 0.05) . Conclusion Ursofalk combined with artificial liver treatment and conventional therapy is safe and more effective in treatment of chronic severe hepatitis.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ursofalk (UDCA) and artificial liver support system in treatment of chronic severe hepatitis. Methods 64 patients with chronic severe hepatitis were randomly divided into two groups : the treated group of 32 cases and the control group of 32 cases. The treatment group was treated with Ursofalk and artificial support systems in addition to conventional therapy. The control group was only treated with conventional therapy. Results In treated group, liver functions of the patients improved significantly ( P 0.05). The markedly effective rate at 4 weeks was 46.9% , effective rate was 25.0% , and the total effective rate was 71.9% . There was significant difference between the two groups ( P 0.05) . Conclusion Ursofalk combined with artificial liver treatment and conventional therapy is safe and more effective in treatment of chronic severe hepatitis.
Key concepts: Medicine, Artificial liver, Hepatitis a virus, Chronic hepatitis, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Hepatitis, Surgery