2011Zhongguo yiyuan yongyao pingjia yu fenxiRequires access

Clinical Efficacy of Mirtazapine vs. Venlafaxine for Somatoform Disorders

Meng Jin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of mitarzaping vs.venlafaxine in the treatment of somatoform disorders.METHODS: In this control study,the patients with somatoform disorders were randomly assigned to receive either mirtazapine or venlafaxine for 8 weeks.The overall therapeutic efficacy was evaluated according to reduction rate of the total scores as assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD),and the safety was evaluated using TESS(Treatment Emergent Symptom scale).RESULTS: The patients treated with venlafaxine showed an excellently effective rate of 40.625% and effective rate of 84.375%,as compared with an excellently effective rate of 66.67% and an effective rate of 93.33% in the patients treated with mirtazapine.The rate of adverse reactions in the trial group was 46.875% in venlafaxine group and 16.67% in the mirtazapine group.CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine results is more effective but safer than venlafaxine in treating patients with somatoform disorders.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of mitarzaping vs.venlafaxine in the treatment of somatoform disorders.METHODS: In this control study,the patients with somatoform disorders were randomly assigned to receive either mirtazapine or venlafaxine for 8 weeks.The overall therapeutic efficacy was evaluated according to reduction rate of the total scores as assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD),and the safety was evaluated using TESS(Treatment Emergent Symptom scale).RESULTS: The patients treated with venlafaxine showed an excellently effective rate of 40.625% and effective rate of 84.375%,as compared with an excellently effective rate of 66.67% and an effective rate of 93.33% in the patients treated with mirtazapine.The rate of adverse reactions in the trial group was 46.875% in venlafaxine group and 16.67% in the mirtazapine group.CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine results is more effective but safer than venlafaxine in treating patients with somatoform disorders.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of mitarzaping vs.venlafaxine in the treatment of somatoform disorders.METHODS: In this control study,the patients with somatoform disorders were randomly assigned to receive either mirtazapine or venlafaxine for 8 weeks.The overall therapeutic efficacy was evaluated according to reduction rate of the total scores as assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD),and the safety was evaluated using TESS(Treatment Emergent Symptom scale).RESULTS: The patients treated with venlafaxine showed an excellently effective rate of 40.625% and effective rate of 84.375%,as compared with an excellently effective rate of 66.67% and an effective rate of 93.33% in the patients treated with mirtazapine.The rate of adverse reactions in the trial group was 46.875% in venlafaxine group and 16.67% in the mirtazapine group.CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine results is more effective but safer than venlafaxine in treating patients with somatoform disorders.

Key concepts: Mirtazapine, Venlafaxine, Hamd, Medicine, Adverse effect, Anesthesia, Internal medicine, Antidepressant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Efficacy of Mirtazapine vs. Venlafaxine for Somatoform Disorders — Research Paper | ScholarLens