2008•Shanxi Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Comparative study on conventional Pap smear and liquid based thinPrep cytology test in the screening of cervical lesions

Fang Xie

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the applicative value and clinical significance of conventional Pap smears(CS)and thinPrep cytology test(TCT)in the screening of cervical lesions.Methods The cervical cytological examination results of 2 247 cases were retrospectively analyzed,of which,1 043 cases were detected by TCT,and 1 204 cases by CS.The sample satisfaction rate,detection rate and diagnose accordance rate between TCT group and CS group were compared.Results The sample satisfaction rate in TCT group was higher than in CS group(99.81% vs 76.83%,P0.01).The detection rate of atypical squmaous cells and above in TCT group was also higher than in CS group(23.78% vs 8.64%,P0.05).But the diagnose accordance rate had no significant difference between TCT group and CS group(86.84% vs 83.33%,P0.05).Conclusion The thinPrep cytology test is more sensitive than conventional smear in detecting cervical lesions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the applicative value and clinical significance of conventional Pap smears(CS)and thinPrep cytology test(TCT)in the screening of cervical lesions.Methods The cervical cytological examination results of 2 247 cases were retrospectively analyzed,of which,1 043 cases were detected by TCT,and 1 204 cases by CS.The sample satisfaction rate,detection rate and diagnose accordance rate between TCT group and CS group were compared.Results The sample satisfaction rate in TCT group was higher than in CS group(99.81% vs 76.83%,P0.01).The detection rate of atypical squmaous cells and above in TCT group was also higher than in CS group(23.78% vs 8.64%,P0.05).But the diagnose accordance rate had no significant difference between TCT group and CS group(86.84% vs 83.33%,P0.05).Conclusion The thinPrep cytology test is more sensitive than conventional smear in detecting cervical lesions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the applicative value and clinical significance of conventional Pap smears(CS)and thinPrep cytology test(TCT)in the screening of cervical lesions.Methods The cervical cytological examination results of 2 247 cases were retrospectively analyzed,of which,1 043 cases were detected by TCT,and 1 204 cases by CS.The sample satisfaction rate,detection rate and diagnose accordance rate between TCT group and CS group were compared.Results The sample satisfaction rate in TCT group was higher than in CS group(99.81% vs 76.83%,P0.01).The detection rate of atypical squmaous cells and above in TCT group was also higher than in CS group(23.78% vs 8.64%,P0.05).But the diagnose accordance rate had no significant difference between TCT group and CS group(86.84% vs 83.33%,P0.05).Conclusion The thinPrep cytology test is more sensitive than conventional smear in detecting cervical lesions.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cytology, Liquid-based cytology, Significant difference, Gynecology, Internal medicine, Pathology, Cervical cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study on conventional Pap smear and liquid based thinPrep cytology test in the screening of cervical lesions — Research Paper | ScholarLens