2005Medical Laboratory SciencesRequires access

Significance of combined determination of anti-SmD1, anti-nucleosome and anti-double stranded DNA in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus

Gong Jianguan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the significance of combined determination of anti-SmD1, anti-nucleosome (AnuA) and anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) in diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods In 40 patients with SLE, 14 patients of other autoimmune diseaes and 20 healthy people, serum anti-dsDNA antibody was determined by radioimmunoassay, anti-SmD_1 and AnuA were tested by IMTEC line immuno assay. Results The positive rate of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA in the patients with SLE was 42.5%, 80.0% and 72.5% respectively. After combined determination of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA, the positive rate rose to 87.5%, and the diagnosis efficiency was 85.2%. Conclusions The combined determination of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA may improve the sensitivity and efficiency of laboratory diagnosis of SLE and has an important significance in diagnosis and treatment of SLE.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the significance of combined determination of anti-SmD1, anti-nucleosome (AnuA) and anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) in diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods In 40 patients with SLE, 14 patients of other autoimmune diseaes and 20 healthy people, serum anti-dsDNA antibody was determined by radioimmunoassay, anti-SmD_1 and AnuA were tested by IMTEC line immuno assay. Results The positive rate of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA in the patients with SLE was 42.5%, 80.0% and 72.5% respectively. After combined determination of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA, the positive rate rose to 87.5%, and the diagnosis efficiency was 85.2%. Conclusions The combined determination of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA may improve the sensitivity and efficiency of laboratory diagnosis of SLE and has an important significance in diagnosis and treatment of SLE.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the significance of combined determination of anti-SmD1, anti-nucleosome (AnuA) and anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) in diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods In 40 patients with SLE, 14 patients of other autoimmune diseaes and 20 healthy people, serum anti-dsDNA antibody was determined by radioimmunoassay, anti-SmD_1 and AnuA were tested by IMTEC line immuno assay. Results The positive rate of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA in the patients with SLE was 42.5%, 80.0% and 72.5% respectively. After combined determination of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA, the positive rate rose to 87.5%, and the diagnosis efficiency was 85.2%. Conclusions The combined determination of anti-dsDNA, anti-SmD1 and AnuA may improve the sensitivity and efficiency of laboratory diagnosis of SLE and has an important significance in diagnosis and treatment of SLE.

Key concepts: Antibody, DNA, Clinical significance, Lupus erythematosus, Medicine, Immunology, Chemistry, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Significance of combined determination of anti-SmD1, anti-nucleosome and anti-double stranded DNA in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus — Research Paper | ScholarLens