2007The Chinese Journal of Modern Applied PharmacyRequires access

A Comparative Quality Analysis of Chrysanthemum Morifolium from Five Defferent Production Areas

Ying Xu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To establish a HPLC method for determination of luteolin and Chlorogenic Acid in chrysanthemum flower from different areas.METHODS ①The Chlorogenic Acid was separated on a column:Dikma Diamonsil C18(200 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm) column;mobile phase:methanol-0.1 mol·L-1.natrium dihydrogen phosphate solution(15.6 g→1 000 mL,pH=2.7)(20:80);the flow rate 1.0 mL·min-1;the column temperature 30℃;the detective wavelength was 328 nm.②The Luteolin was sparated on a Dikma Diamonsil C18(200 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm)column,the mobile phase:methanol-water(55:45),flow rate 1.0 mL·min-1,UV wavelength 353 nm,column temperature 30 ℃.RESULTS ①The Chlorogenic Acid calibration curve showed good linearity in the range of 0.2~1.0 μg(r=0.999 9),the average recovery was 98.25%(RSD=0.71%).②The Luteolin calibration curve showed good linearity in the range of 0.1~1.0 μg(r=0.999 9),the average recovery was 98.99%(RSD=1.03%).CONCLUSION The method is simple,accurate and specific.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To establish a HPLC method for determination of luteolin and Chlorogenic Acid in chrysanthemum flower from different areas.METHODS ①The Chlorogenic Acid was separated on a column:Dikma Diamonsil C18(200 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm) column;mobile phase:methanol-0.1 mol·L-1.natrium dihydrogen phosphate solution(15.6 g→1 000 mL,pH=2.7)(20:80);the flow rate 1.0 mL·min-1;the column temperature 30℃;the detective wavelength was 328 nm.②The Luteolin was sparated on a Dikma Diamonsil C18(200 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm)column,the mobile phase:methanol-water(55:45),flow rate 1.0 mL·min-1,UV wavelength 353 nm,column temperature 30 ℃.RESULTS ①The Chlorogenic Acid calibration curve showed good linearity in the range of 0.2~1.0 μg(r=0.999 9),the average recovery was 98.25%(RSD=0.71%).②The Luteolin calibration curve showed good linearity in the range of 0.1~1.0 μg(r=0.999 9),the average recovery was 98.99%(RSD=1.03%).CONCLUSION The method is simple,accurate and specific.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To establish a HPLC method for determination of luteolin and Chlorogenic Acid in chrysanthemum flower from different areas.METHODS ①The Chlorogenic Acid was separated on a column:Dikma Diamonsil C18(200 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm) column;mobile phase:methanol-0.1 mol·L-1.natrium dihydrogen phosphate solution(15.6 g→1 000 mL,pH=2.7)(20:80);the flow rate 1.0 mL·min-1;the column temperature 30℃;the detective wavelength was 328 nm.②The Luteolin was sparated on a Dikma Diamonsil C18(200 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm)column,the mobile phase:methanol-water(55:45),flow rate 1.0 mL·min-1,UV wavelength 353 nm,column temperature 30 ℃.RESULTS ①The Chlorogenic Acid calibration curve showed good linearity in the range of 0.2~1.0 μg(r=0.999 9),the average recovery was 98.25%(RSD=0.71%).②The Luteolin calibration curve showed good linearity in the range of 0.1~1.0 μg(r=0.999 9),the average recovery was 98.99%(RSD=1.03%).CONCLUSION The method is simple,accurate and specific.

Key concepts: Luteolin, Chrysanthemum morifolium, Chlorogenic acid, Calibration curve, Chromatography, Chemistry, High-performance liquid chromatography, Methanol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Quality Analysis of Chrysanthemum Morifolium from Five Defferent Production Areas — Research Paper | ScholarLens