2002Zhonghua putong waike zazhiRequires access

Study of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for parenteral nutrition

Hai Jiang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AbstrcatObjectiveTo determine the safety and effect of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) for parenteral nutrition(PN). MethodsThe clinical data of 50 consecutive patients who receiving PN via PICC were compared with 50 patients who receiving PN via central venous catheter(CVC).ResultsThe average catheter insertion days were 17.56d in group PICC,and 18.24d in group CVC(P0.05).PN completed rate was 92.0% in group PICC,and 96.0% in group CVC (P0.05).The incidence of complications was 18.0% in group PICC,and 14.0% in group CVC(P0.05).The complications of PICC included phlebitis,catheter occulusion,infection,malposition of catheter,but no pneumothorax or hemopneumothorax occured .Group PICC had higher phlebitis than that in group CVC(P0.05).Conclusions PICC may be a safe and effective alternation to patients receiving PN.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AbstrcatObjectiveTo determine the safety and effect of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) for parenteral nutrition(PN). MethodsThe clinical data of 50 consecutive patients who receiving PN via PICC were compared with 50 patients who receiving PN via central venous catheter(CVC).ResultsThe average catheter insertion days were 17.56d in group PICC,and 18.24d in group CVC(P0.05).PN completed rate was 92.0% in group PICC,and 96.0% in group CVC (P0.05).The incidence of complications was 18.0% in group PICC,and 14.0% in group CVC(P0.05).The complications of PICC included phlebitis,catheter occulusion,infection,malposition of catheter,but no pneumothorax or hemopneumothorax occured .Group PICC had higher phlebitis than that in group CVC(P0.05).Conclusions PICC may be a safe and effective alternation to patients receiving PN.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AbstrcatObjectiveTo determine the safety and effect of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) for parenteral nutrition(PN). MethodsThe clinical data of 50 consecutive patients who receiving PN via PICC were compared with 50 patients who receiving PN via central venous catheter(CVC).ResultsThe average catheter insertion days were 17.56d in group PICC,and 18.24d in group CVC(P0.05).PN completed rate was 92.0% in group PICC,and 96.0% in group CVC (P0.05).The incidence of complications was 18.0% in group PICC,and 14.0% in group CVC(P0.05).The complications of PICC included phlebitis,catheter occulusion,infection,malposition of catheter,but no pneumothorax or hemopneumothorax occured .Group PICC had higher phlebitis than that in group CVC(P0.05).Conclusions PICC may be a safe and effective alternation to patients receiving PN.

Key concepts: Medicine, Peripherally inserted central catheter, Parenteral nutrition, Pneumothorax, Central venous catheter, Catheter, Surgery, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for parenteral nutrition — Research Paper | ScholarLens