2014•Chinese Journal of the Frontiers of Medical ScienceRequires access

Comparison of clinical efficacy of entecavir antiviral 2 decompensated liver cirrhosis and compensatory phase patients with chronichepatitis B

SI Hui-yua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study entecavir decompensated cirrhosis and decompensated differences in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients, provide proper guidance for the clinical treatment of patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis and different stages. Method Randomly selected our hospital patients with decompensated cirrhosis 20 cases, 18 cases of patients with compensated cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B patients with newly diagnosed 38 cases, three groups of patients were treated with entecavir antiviral treatment, and follow-up observation. Compared the changes of three groups of patients before and after treatment alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), hepatitis B virus e antigen(HBeAg), HBV DNA quantitative, cholinesterase(CHE), serum total bilirubin(TBIL), serum albumin(ALB) and other indicators. Result Three groups of patients before treatment difference of indicators had no significant(P 0.05). Before each indicator and treatment after treatment, ALT, AST, HBV DNA, TBIL levels showed a clear downward trend, and the difference between before and after treatment was significant(P0.05) in each group; HBeAg, CHE, ALB levels before treatment comparison showed a clear upward trend, the difference was significant(P0.05); after treatment three groups indexes showed no significant difference(P 0.05). Conclusion The clinical entecavir decompensated cirrhosis and decompensated chronic hepatitis B have better recovery of liver function, reduce viral load effect, and for the treatment of liver cirrhosis significant difference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study entecavir decompensated cirrhosis and decompensated differences in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients, provide proper guidance for the clinical treatment of patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis and different stages. Method Randomly selected our hospital patients with decompensated cirrhosis 20 cases, 18 cases of patients with compensated cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B patients with newly diagnosed 38 cases, three groups of patients were treated with entecavir antiviral treatment, and follow-up observation. Compared the changes of three groups of patients before and after treatment alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), hepatitis B virus e antigen(HBeAg), HBV DNA quantitative, cholinesterase(CHE), serum total bilirubin(TBIL), serum albumin(ALB) and other indicators. Result Three groups of patients before treatment difference of indicators had no significant(P 0.05). Before each indicator and treatment after treatment, ALT, AST, HBV DNA, TBIL levels showed a clear downward trend, and the difference between before and after treatment was significant(P0.05) in each group; HBeAg, CHE, ALB levels before treatment comparison showed a clear upward trend, the difference was significant(P0.05); after treatment three groups indexes showed no significant difference(P 0.05). Conclusion The clinical entecavir decompensated cirrhosis and decompensated chronic hepatitis B have better recovery of liver function, reduce viral load effect, and for the treatment of liver cirrhosis significant difference.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study entecavir decompensated cirrhosis and decompensated differences in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients, provide proper guidance for the clinical treatment of patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis and different stages. Method Randomly selected our hospital patients with decompensated cirrhosis 20 cases, 18 cases of patients with compensated cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B patients with newly diagnosed 38 cases, three groups of patients were treated with entecavir antiviral treatment, and follow-up observation. Compared the changes of three groups of patients before and after treatment alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), hepatitis B virus e antigen(HBeAg), HBV DNA quantitative, cholinesterase(CHE), serum total bilirubin(TBIL), serum albumin(ALB) and other indicators. Result Three groups of patients before treatment difference of indicators had no significant(P 0.05). Before each indicator and treatment after treatment, ALT, AST, HBV DNA, TBIL levels showed a clear downward trend, and the difference between before and after treatment was significant(P0.05) in each group; HBeAg, CHE, ALB levels before treatment comparison showed a clear upward trend, the difference was significant(P0.05); after treatment three groups indexes showed no significant difference(P 0.05). Conclusion The clinical entecavir decompensated cirrhosis and decompensated chronic hepatitis B have better recovery of liver function, reduce viral load effect, and for the treatment of liver cirrhosis significant difference.

Key concepts: Entecavir, Medicine, Cirrhosis, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Liver function, HBeAg, Bilirubin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of clinical efficacy of entecavir antiviral 2 decompensated liver cirrhosis and compensatory phase patients with chronichepatitis B — Research Paper | ScholarLens