2013Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular DiseaseRequires access

Effect Analysis of Different Treatment Regimens in the Treatment of Cerebral Infarction

Xie Quan-shen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of different methods in the treatment of cerebral infarction.Methods To divide randomly 100 cases of cerebral infarction in our hospital into two groups,study group was treated with edaravone combined batroxobin treatment,the control group used batroxobin therapy alone,and to observe the therapeutic effect of two groups.Results The patients in study group the total effective rate was 98.0%,higher than 84.0% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05);Treatment for 2 weeks,3 weeks after the study of neurological deficit scores were lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of edaravone combined with batroxobin in treatment of acute cerebral infarction is better than single use of batroxobin,and less adverse reaction,is worth promoting.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of different methods in the treatment of cerebral infarction.Methods To divide randomly 100 cases of cerebral infarction in our hospital into two groups,study group was treated with edaravone combined batroxobin treatment,the control group used batroxobin therapy alone,and to observe the therapeutic effect of two groups.Results The patients in study group the total effective rate was 98.0%,higher than 84.0% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05);Treatment for 2 weeks,3 weeks after the study of neurological deficit scores were lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of edaravone combined with batroxobin in treatment of acute cerebral infarction is better than single use of batroxobin,and less adverse reaction,is worth promoting.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of different methods in the treatment of cerebral infarction.Methods To divide randomly 100 cases of cerebral infarction in our hospital into two groups,study group was treated with edaravone combined batroxobin treatment,the control group used batroxobin therapy alone,and to observe the therapeutic effect of two groups.Results The patients in study group the total effective rate was 98.0%,higher than 84.0% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05);Treatment for 2 weeks,3 weeks after the study of neurological deficit scores were lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of edaravone combined with batroxobin in treatment of acute cerebral infarction is better than single use of batroxobin,and less adverse reaction,is worth promoting.

Key concepts: Batroxobin, Medicine, Edaravone, Cerebral infarction, Significant difference, Conventional treatment, Treatment and control groups, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect Analysis of Different Treatment Regimens in the Treatment of Cerebral Infarction — Research Paper | ScholarLens