2014Xiandai shengwu yixue jinzhanRequires access

The Impact on Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy and Gastroesophageal Varices about Endoscopic Sclerotherapy and Ligation in the Treatment of Esophageal Varices

Kuang Min-hen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To explore the impact of portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastroesophageal varices about endoscopic sclerotherapy and ligation in the treatment of esophageal varices. Methods: 97 patients with bleeding after endoscopic treatment with liver cirrhosis upper gastrointestinal were chosen, among whom 19 cases were undergone endoscopic EVS treatment, 78 cases were undergone endoscopic treatment of EVL, 1 years of follow-up. 3 months, 6 months and 1 year later, the probability of occurring in patients with GV and PHG was observed. Results: After 3 months of treatment, the incidence of complications such as GV and PHG was17.5%(17/97) and 39.2%(38/97) respectively, compared with those before treatment, there was no significant difference(P0.05); After6 months of treatment, the incidence of complications was 32%(31/97) and 70.1%(68/97), compared with before treatment, there was a significant increase in the number(P0.05); After 1 year of treatment, GV, PHG rate was 42.3%(41/97) and 88.7%(86/97) respectively,concurrent number was significantly higher than that of before treatment(P0.05). Conclusion: Endoscopic EVS, EVL treatment can not only control esophageal varices bleeding, but also can increase the probability of concurrent PHG, GV, is worth the clinical prevention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To explore the impact of portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastroesophageal varices about endoscopic sclerotherapy and ligation in the treatment of esophageal varices. Methods: 97 patients with bleeding after endoscopic treatment with liver cirrhosis upper gastrointestinal were chosen, among whom 19 cases were undergone endoscopic EVS treatment, 78 cases were undergone endoscopic treatment of EVL, 1 years of follow-up. 3 months, 6 months and 1 year later, the probability of occurring in patients with GV and PHG was observed. Results: After 3 months of treatment, the incidence of complications such as GV and PHG was17.5%(17/97) and 39.2%(38/97) respectively, compared with those before treatment, there was no significant difference(P0.05); After6 months of treatment, the incidence of complications was 32%(31/97) and 70.1%(68/97), compared with before treatment, there was a significant increase in the number(P0.05); After 1 year of treatment, GV, PHG rate was 42.3%(41/97) and 88.7%(86/97) respectively,concurrent number was significantly higher than that of before treatment(P0.05). Conclusion: Endoscopic EVS, EVL treatment can not only control esophageal varices bleeding, but also can increase the probability of concurrent PHG, GV, is worth the clinical prevention.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To explore the impact of portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastroesophageal varices about endoscopic sclerotherapy and ligation in the treatment of esophageal varices. Methods: 97 patients with bleeding after endoscopic treatment with liver cirrhosis upper gastrointestinal were chosen, among whom 19 cases were undergone endoscopic EVS treatment, 78 cases were undergone endoscopic treatment of EVL, 1 years of follow-up. 3 months, 6 months and 1 year later, the probability of occurring in patients with GV and PHG was observed. Results: After 3 months of treatment, the incidence of complications such as GV and PHG was17.5%(17/97) and 39.2%(38/97) respectively, compared with those before treatment, there was no significant difference(P0.05); After6 months of treatment, the incidence of complications was 32%(31/97) and 70.1%(68/97), compared with before treatment, there was a significant increase in the number(P0.05); After 1 year of treatment, GV, PHG rate was 42.3%(41/97) and 88.7%(86/97) respectively,concurrent number was significantly higher than that of before treatment(P0.05). Conclusion: Endoscopic EVS, EVL treatment can not only control esophageal varices bleeding, but also can increase the probability of concurrent PHG, GV, is worth the clinical prevention.

Key concepts: Medicine, Portal hypertensive gastropathy, Sclerotherapy, Esophageal varices, Gastroenterology, Varices, Cirrhosis, Portal hypertension

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Impact on Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy and Gastroesophageal Varices about Endoscopic Sclerotherapy and Ligation in the Treatment of Esophageal Varices — Research Paper | ScholarLens