2005Clinical Medical Journal of ChinaRequires access

Comparision of Lornoxican and Fentanyl for Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Low Abdominal Surgery

Zhanggang Xue

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the analgesic efficacy of lornoxicam and fentanyl in the treatment of PCA. Methods: 40 patients,scheduled for elective low abdominal surgery, were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Patients in Group A were received intravenous lornoxicam ( 2 ml/h, bolus 3. 5 ml), patients in Group B were received intravenous fentanyl (2 ml/h, bolus 3. 5 ml). Results: There was no significant difference in PI, PAR, global impression score and dose between Group A and Group B(P0. 05), however, patients in Group B experienced worse sleeping quality than those in Group A. (P0. 05) . There was no significant difference in respiratory rate, itch,nausea and vomiting between Group A and Group B. Conclusion:Conclusion Lornoxicam was an alternative to opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To assess the analgesic efficacy of lornoxicam and fentanyl in the treatment of PCA. Methods: 40 patients,scheduled for elective low abdominal surgery, were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Patients in Group A were received intravenous lornoxicam ( 2 ml/h, bolus 3. 5 ml), patients in Group B were received intravenous fentanyl (2 ml/h, bolus 3. 5 ml). Results: There was no significant difference in PI, PAR, global impression score and dose between Group A and Group B(P0. 05), however, patients in Group B experienced worse sleeping quality than those in Group A. (P0. 05) . There was no significant difference in respiratory rate, itch,nausea and vomiting between Group A and Group B. Conclusion:Conclusion Lornoxicam was an alternative to opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To assess the analgesic efficacy of lornoxicam and fentanyl in the treatment of PCA. Methods: 40 patients,scheduled for elective low abdominal surgery, were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Patients in Group A were received intravenous lornoxicam ( 2 ml/h, bolus 3. 5 ml), patients in Group B were received intravenous fentanyl (2 ml/h, bolus 3. 5 ml). Results: There was no significant difference in PI, PAR, global impression score and dose between Group A and Group B(P0. 05), however, patients in Group B experienced worse sleeping quality than those in Group A. (P0. 05) . There was no significant difference in respiratory rate, itch,nausea and vomiting between Group A and Group B. Conclusion:Conclusion Lornoxicam was an alternative to opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Key concepts: Lornoxicam, Medicine, Fentanyl, Anesthesia, Nausea, Analgesic, Vomiting, Bolus (digestion)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparision of Lornoxican and Fentanyl for Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Low Abdominal Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens