2004PubMedRequires access

[Comparative study on cefdinir and cefaclor in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia].

Xing-Tang Jiang, Yanping Du, Liping Deng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefdinir in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: A prospective single-blind randomized controlled clinical study was performed comparing cefdinir with cefaclor in the treatment of sixty-four patients with CAP. The clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety were compared between cefdinir and cefaclor in treating mild to moderate CAP. Thirty-three patients were treated with cefdinir 100 mg, orally, three times a day (cefdinir group), thirty-one patients were treated with cefaclor 500 mg, orally, three times a day (cefaclor group). In both groups 7-14 d was a treatment course. RESULTS: The cure rate of cefdinir and cefaclor was 84.8% and 77.4% respectively and the overall efficacy rate was 93.9% and 87.1% respectively. The bacterial positive rates and bacterial eradication rates of the two groups were 81.8%, 80.7% and 96.3%, 88%, respectively. The adverse drug reaction rate were 3% in cefdinir group and 6.5% in cefaclor group. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups for the above results (P >0.05). The time of given medicine of cefdinir and cefaclor was (10.8 +/- 1.6) d and (12.1 +/- 1.7) d (P <0.01) respectively. CONCLUSION: cefdinir is safe and effective, shorten the course of treatment in the treatment of mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefdinir in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: A prospective single-blind randomized controlled clinical study was performed comparing cefdinir with cefaclor in the treatment of sixty-four patients with CAP. The clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety were compared between cefdinir and cefaclor in treating mild to moderate CAP. Thirty-three patients were treated with cefdinir 100 mg, orally, three times a day (cefdinir group), thirty-one patients were treated with cefaclor 500 mg, orally, three times a day (cefaclor group). In both groups 7-14 d was a treatment course. RESULTS: The cure rate of cefdinir and cefaclor was 84.8% and 77.4% respectively and the overall efficacy rate was 93.9% and 87.1% respectively. The bacterial positive rates and bacterial eradication rates of the two groups were 81.8%, 80.7% and 96.3%, 88%, respectively. The adverse drug reaction rate were 3% in cefdinir group and 6.5% in cefaclor group. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups for the above results (P >0.05). The time of given medicine of cefdinir and cefaclor was (10.8 +/- 1.6) d and (12.1 +/- 1.7) d (P <0.01) respectively. CONCLUSION: cefdinir is safe and effective, shorten the course of treatment in the treatment of mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefdinir in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: A prospective single-blind randomized controlled clinical study was performed comparing cefdinir with cefaclor in the treatment of sixty-four patients with CAP. The clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety were compared between cefdinir and cefaclor in treating mild to moderate CAP. Thirty-three patients were treated with cefdinir 100 mg, orally, three times a day (cefdinir group), thirty-one patients were treated with cefaclor 500 mg, orally, three times a day (cefaclor group). In both groups 7-14 d was a treatment course. RESULTS: The cure rate of cefdinir and cefaclor was 84.8% and 77.4% respectively and the overall efficacy rate was 93.9% and 87.1% respectively. The bacterial positive rates and bacterial eradication rates of the two groups were 81.8%, 80.7% and 96.3%, 88%, respectively. The adverse drug reaction rate were 3% in cefdinir group and 6.5% in cefaclor group. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups for the above results (P >0.05). The time of given medicine of cefdinir and cefaclor was (10.8 +/- 1.6) d and (12.1 +/- 1.7) d (P <0.01) respectively. CONCLUSION: cefdinir is safe and effective, shorten the course of treatment in the treatment of mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia.

Key concepts: Cefdinir, Cefaclor, Medicine, Pneumonia, Community-acquired pneumonia, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Cephalosporin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparative study on cefdinir and cefaclor in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens