2010Journal of Daqing Normal UniversityRequires access

Judicial Self-restraint or Judicial Activism——A Judge in the Selection Dilemma

Hui Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Judicial activism and restraint doctrine are the judicial activities of judges in the judicial philosophy model.Judicial restraint doctrine demonstrates the intention of the rule of law and respect,and the law has been considerably intelligible,predictable and widely respected Judicial activism is demonstrated by the pursuit of possible cases of justice,and has been under the attention of many supporters,so fierce collision of these two models traps judges.In our country,judges should uphold a mild judicial philosophy of activism to better the rule of law and pursue for justice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Judicial activism and restraint doctrine are the judicial activities of judges in the judicial philosophy model.Judicial restraint doctrine demonstrates the intention of the rule of law and respect,and the law has been considerably intelligible,predictable and widely respected Judicial activism is demonstrated by the pursuit of possible cases of justice,and has been under the attention of many supporters,so fierce collision of these two models traps judges.In our country,judges should uphold a mild judicial philosophy of activism to better the rule of law and pursue for justice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Judicial activism and restraint doctrine are the judicial activities of judges in the judicial philosophy model.Judicial restraint doctrine demonstrates the intention of the rule of law and respect,and the law has been considerably intelligible,predictable and widely respected Judicial activism is demonstrated by the pursuit of possible cases of justice,and has been under the attention of many supporters,so fierce collision of these two models traps judges.In our country,judges should uphold a mild judicial philosophy of activism to better the rule of law and pursue for justice.

Key concepts: Judicial activism, Doctrine, Law, Dilemma, Economic Justice, Political science, Judicial discretion, Rule of law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Judicial Self-restraint or Judicial Activism——A Judge in the Selection Dilemma — Research Paper | ScholarLens