2008Hebei faxueRequires access

Pursuing Moderate Judicial Activism——On judicial philosophy of judges in hard case

Liang Ying-xiu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

When judges face hard cases, their judicial philosophy will influence the verdict essentially. A judge who insists in judicial activism tends to fulfill social demand. However, the judge that persists in judicial self-restraint often regards himself as deputy of legislators. They refuse to solve the important social problems in judicial process. As far as legal construction of China is concerned, moderate judicial activism should be judicial philosophy of judges facing hard cases. Judges should reply to social change and realize social justice by means of creative judicial activities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When judges face hard cases, their judicial philosophy will influence the verdict essentially. A judge who insists in judicial activism tends to fulfill social demand. However, the judge that persists in judicial self-restraint often regards himself as deputy of legislators. They refuse to solve the important social problems in judicial process. As far as legal construction of China is concerned, moderate judicial activism should be judicial philosophy of judges facing hard cases. Judges should reply to social change and realize social justice by means of creative judicial activities.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When judges face hard cases, their judicial philosophy will influence the verdict essentially. A judge who insists in judicial activism tends to fulfill social demand. However, the judge that persists in judicial self-restraint often regards himself as deputy of legislators. They refuse to solve the important social problems in judicial process. As far as legal construction of China is concerned, moderate judicial activism should be judicial philosophy of judges facing hard cases. Judges should reply to social change and realize social justice by means of creative judicial activities.

Key concepts: Judicial activism, Law, Judicial restraint, Political science, Face (sociological concept), Judicial opinion, Economic Justice, Judicial review

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pursuing Moderate Judicial Activism——On judicial philosophy of judges in hard case — Research Paper | ScholarLens