Judicial Activism in the Context of China
Gong Jun-wei
Abstract
Gong Jun-wei
Abstract
Judicial activism is the hot topic in both theory and practice fields in China because it has different views on adopting judicial activism or judicial restraint,which refers to how much the discretional power a judge can have.In China,based on the judge's pursuit of the judicial restraint,royalty and modesty for the law,and the respect of court for the administrative and judicial departments,the judges should uphold judicial activism,develop their subjective initiative and intelligence to meet the demand of the society and solve the social conflicts,therefore,keep the dynamic balance between the judicial activism and the judicial restraint.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Judicial activism is the hot topic in both theory and practice fields in China because it has different views on adopting judicial activism or judicial restraint,which refers to how much the discretional power a judge can have.In China,based on the judge's pursuit of the judicial restraint,royalty and modesty for the law,and the respect of court for the administrative and judicial departments,the judges should uphold judicial activism,develop their subjective initiative and intelligence to meet the demand of the society and solve the social conflicts,therefore,keep the dynamic balance between the judicial activism and the judicial restraint.
Key concepts: Judicial activism, China, Law, Judicial restraint, Context (archaeology), Political science, Judicial review, Judicial opinion