2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of short-term efficacy between the NP and GP regimens in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Chen Huai-yun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the short-term therapeutic efficacy,toxicity and side reactions between navelbine plus cisplatin(NP regimen) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin(GP regimen) in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:Forty-five patients with cytologically and pathologically confirmed NSCLC were divided into two groups.Twenty-three cases in the A group received NP regimen chemotherapy.Twenty-two cases in the B group received GP regimen chemotherapy.Both regimens were repeated after a cycle of 21 days.Results:Response rates were 47.8%(A group) and 54.5%(B group) respectively for NP and GP regimens,without statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity in both groups.Gastrointestinal reaction and local phlebitis were also observed.The rates of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ leukopemia were 34.8%(A group) and 31.8%(B group),the rates of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ thrombocytopenia were 4.3%(A group) and 9.1%(B group),without statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Local rates of phlebitis were 34.8%(A group) and 0(B group),with statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion:The therapeutic effectiveness of NP regimen is similar to that of GP regimen.The toxic reactions were tolerable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the short-term therapeutic efficacy,toxicity and side reactions between navelbine plus cisplatin(NP regimen) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin(GP regimen) in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:Forty-five patients with cytologically and pathologically confirmed NSCLC were divided into two groups.Twenty-three cases in the A group received NP regimen chemotherapy.Twenty-two cases in the B group received GP regimen chemotherapy.Both regimens were repeated after a cycle of 21 days.Results:Response rates were 47.8%(A group) and 54.5%(B group) respectively for NP and GP regimens,without statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity in both groups.Gastrointestinal reaction and local phlebitis were also observed.The rates of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ leukopemia were 34.8%(A group) and 31.8%(B group),the rates of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ thrombocytopenia were 4.3%(A group) and 9.1%(B group),without statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Local rates of phlebitis were 34.8%(A group) and 0(B group),with statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion:The therapeutic effectiveness of NP regimen is similar to that of GP regimen.The toxic reactions were tolerable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the short-term therapeutic efficacy,toxicity and side reactions between navelbine plus cisplatin(NP regimen) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin(GP regimen) in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:Forty-five patients with cytologically and pathologically confirmed NSCLC were divided into two groups.Twenty-three cases in the A group received NP regimen chemotherapy.Twenty-two cases in the B group received GP regimen chemotherapy.Both regimens were repeated after a cycle of 21 days.Results:Response rates were 47.8%(A group) and 54.5%(B group) respectively for NP and GP regimens,without statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity in both groups.Gastrointestinal reaction and local phlebitis were also observed.The rates of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ leukopemia were 34.8%(A group) and 31.8%(B group),the rates of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ thrombocytopenia were 4.3%(A group) and 9.1%(B group),without statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Local rates of phlebitis were 34.8%(A group) and 0(B group),with statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion:The therapeutic effectiveness of NP regimen is similar to that of GP regimen.The toxic reactions were tolerable.

Key concepts: Regimen, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Medicine, Lung cancer, Chemotherapy, Internal medicine, Group B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of short-term efficacy between the NP and GP regimens in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens