Therapeutic Analysis of Minimally Invasive Craniopuncture on Patients with Moderate Hypertensive Basal Nuclei Hematoncus
Ji Zhang
Abstract
Ji Zhang
Abstract
Objective To investigate the curative effect of minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy on patients with moderate hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Method 96 patients with moderate hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage were randomly divided into 2 groups: the control group and the exprerimental group. Each group had 48 cases. The control group was treated with traditional method and the experimental group was treated with minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy. Compare the clinical efficacy of two groups of patients. Results The good rate of the experimental group(64.58%) was significantly higher than that control group(47.92%). The mortality rate of experimental group(6.25%) was significantly lower than the control group(10.42%). After treatment, scores of nerve function defect of patients in experimental group was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant. The consciousness recovery rate of the experimental group(75.00%) was significantly higher than that control group(47.92%). Conclusion Minimally invasive surgery could reduce the degree of neurological deficits and improve the prognosis of patients. So it deserves to be promoted widely.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the curative effect of minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy on patients with moderate hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Method 96 patients with moderate hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage were randomly divided into 2 groups: the control group and the exprerimental group. Each group had 48 cases. The control group was treated with traditional method and the experimental group was treated with minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy. Compare the clinical efficacy of two groups of patients. Results The good rate of the experimental group(64.58%) was significantly higher than that control group(47.92%). The mortality rate of experimental group(6.25%) was significantly lower than the control group(10.42%). After treatment, scores of nerve function defect of patients in experimental group was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant. The consciousness recovery rate of the experimental group(75.00%) was significantly higher than that control group(47.92%). Conclusion Minimally invasive surgery could reduce the degree of neurological deficits and improve the prognosis of patients. So it deserves to be promoted widely.
Key concepts: Medicine, Basal (medicine), Basal ganglia, Therapeutic effect, Surgery, Clinical efficacy, Anesthesia, Internal medicine