2012China Medical HeraldRequires access

Diagostic values of carcinoembryonic antigen and C-reactive protein in differentiate between tuberculosis and malignant pleural effusion

Liping Yang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To discuss the value of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) and C reactive protein(CRP) in differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.Methods The levels of CEA and CRP in 34 cases of neoplastic pleural effusion and 86 cases of tuberculous pleural effusion were detected and compared.Results CEA level and positive rate in pleural effusion group was significantly higher than that of malignant pleural effusion group,while the CRP level and positive rate in pleural effusion group was higher than that of tuberculosis of malignant pleural effusion group,differences were statistically significant(P 0.01),and CEA 8 μg/L in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion sensitivity was 55.88%,specificity was 100.00%,while the CRP 6 mg/L for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion sensitivity was 78.18%,specificity was 87.18%.Conclusion CRP and CEA have important value in differential diagnosis of neoplastic pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To discuss the value of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) and C reactive protein(CRP) in differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.Methods The levels of CEA and CRP in 34 cases of neoplastic pleural effusion and 86 cases of tuberculous pleural effusion were detected and compared.Results CEA level and positive rate in pleural effusion group was significantly higher than that of malignant pleural effusion group,while the CRP level and positive rate in pleural effusion group was higher than that of tuberculosis of malignant pleural effusion group,differences were statistically significant(P 0.01),and CEA 8 μg/L in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion sensitivity was 55.88%,specificity was 100.00%,while the CRP 6 mg/L for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion sensitivity was 78.18%,specificity was 87.18%.Conclusion CRP and CEA have important value in differential diagnosis of neoplastic pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To discuss the value of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) and C reactive protein(CRP) in differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.Methods The levels of CEA and CRP in 34 cases of neoplastic pleural effusion and 86 cases of tuberculous pleural effusion were detected and compared.Results CEA level and positive rate in pleural effusion group was significantly higher than that of malignant pleural effusion group,while the CRP level and positive rate in pleural effusion group was higher than that of tuberculosis of malignant pleural effusion group,differences were statistically significant(P 0.01),and CEA 8 μg/L in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion sensitivity was 55.88%,specificity was 100.00%,while the CRP 6 mg/L for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion sensitivity was 78.18%,specificity was 87.18%.Conclusion CRP and CEA have important value in differential diagnosis of neoplastic pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion.

Key concepts: Medicine, Carcinoembryonic antigen, Pleural effusion, Malignant pleural effusion, Tuberculosis, Effusion, Differential diagnosis, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagostic values of carcinoembryonic antigen and C-reactive protein in differentiate between tuberculosis and malignant pleural effusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens