2015Journal of Shanxi Datong UniversityRequires access

Comparative Study of Hand Use Stainless Steel Files and Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments in Root Canal Preparation

Wang Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective A comparative study of hand use stainless steel tube expandingclinical effect of file and the Mtwo root ex-pansion system root canal preparation after operation. Methods To selecrt clinical 62 teeth with chronic pulpitis or chronic periapicalperiodontitis need for root canal treatment, total 146 root canals, respectively using stainless steel files and Mtwo nickel titanium filesfor root canal preparation, formocresol cotton temporarily closed for a week to observethe incidence of postoperative pain. Results Hand use stainless steel file group of pain in 8 teeth with 17 root canals after operation, Mtwo group of pain in 3 teeth with 6 root ca-nals after operation, after X2 square test,there were statistically significant differences. Conclusions The clinical effect of nickel titani-um rotary instruments in root canal preparation is better than manual stainless steel file. Mtwo machine is worthy of clinical use.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective A comparative study of hand use stainless steel tube expandingclinical effect of file and the Mtwo root ex-pansion system root canal preparation after operation. Methods To selecrt clinical 62 teeth with chronic pulpitis or chronic periapicalperiodontitis need for root canal treatment, total 146 root canals, respectively using stainless steel files and Mtwo nickel titanium filesfor root canal preparation, formocresol cotton temporarily closed for a week to observethe incidence of postoperative pain. Results Hand use stainless steel file group of pain in 8 teeth with 17 root canals after operation, Mtwo group of pain in 3 teeth with 6 root ca-nals after operation, after X2 square test,there were statistically significant differences. Conclusions The clinical effect of nickel titani-um rotary instruments in root canal preparation is better than manual stainless steel file. Mtwo machine is worthy of clinical use.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective A comparative study of hand use stainless steel tube expandingclinical effect of file and the Mtwo root ex-pansion system root canal preparation after operation. Methods To selecrt clinical 62 teeth with chronic pulpitis or chronic periapicalperiodontitis need for root canal treatment, total 146 root canals, respectively using stainless steel files and Mtwo nickel titanium filesfor root canal preparation, formocresol cotton temporarily closed for a week to observethe incidence of postoperative pain. Results Hand use stainless steel file group of pain in 8 teeth with 17 root canals after operation, Mtwo group of pain in 3 teeth with 6 root ca-nals after operation, after X2 square test,there were statistically significant differences. Conclusions The clinical effect of nickel titani-um rotary instruments in root canal preparation is better than manual stainless steel file. Mtwo machine is worthy of clinical use.

Key concepts: Root canal, Dentistry, Nickel titanium, Pulpotomy, Postoperative pain, Medicine, Dental instruments, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study of Hand Use Stainless Steel Files and Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments in Root Canal Preparation — Research Paper | ScholarLens