2000Shiyong zhongliu zazhiRequires access

Nausea in the prophylaxis of gastrointestinal reaction induced by chemotherapy

Feng Feng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nausea injection in prophylaxis of gastrointestinal reaction in- duced by chemotherapeutic agents,and compare them with those of kytril. Methods A randomized,self-crossover control trial was performed. All eligible patients were randomized into AB or BA group. The patients in AB group were treated by nasea in the first cycle and kytril in the second cycle,those in BA group were treated with the reverse order. Results In 43 patients enrolled in the study, 40 were evaluable for response. Nasea was significantly superior to kytril in the control of anorexia(70% vs 47. 5 % ) in the 12 hour period and nausea(57. 5 % vs 37. 5 % ) in the 24 hour period,P0. 05. In the control of vomiting in the 24 hour pe- riod,no statistical difference between the two drugs was observed but the response rate of nausea(75 %) was higher than that of kytril (55%) . The side effects of nausea were headache, feeling of head heaviness, dry month and fatigue,etc. All of these were mild and comparable with kytril in their frequencies. Conclusion Nausea can effectively prevent the gastrointestinal reaction in- duced by chemotherapeutic agents. It is superior to kytril in the control of anorexia and nausea. The side effects of nausea are mild.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nausea injection in prophylaxis of gastrointestinal reaction in- duced by chemotherapeutic agents,and compare them with those of kytril. Methods A randomized,self-crossover control trial was performed. All eligible patients were randomized into AB or BA group. The patients in AB group were treated by nasea in the first cycle and kytril in the second cycle,those in BA group were treated with the reverse order. Results In 43 patients enrolled in the study, 40 were evaluable for response. Nasea was significantly superior to kytril in the control of anorexia(70% vs 47. 5 % ) in the 12 hour period and nausea(57. 5 % vs 37. 5 % ) in the 24 hour period,P0. 05. In the control of vomiting in the 24 hour pe- riod,no statistical difference between the two drugs was observed but the response rate of nausea(75 %) was higher than that of kytril (55%) . The side effects of nausea were headache, feeling of head heaviness, dry month and fatigue,etc. All of these were mild and comparable with kytril in their frequencies. Conclusion Nausea can effectively prevent the gastrointestinal reaction in- duced by chemotherapeutic agents. It is superior to kytril in the control of anorexia and nausea. The side effects of nausea are mild.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nausea injection in prophylaxis of gastrointestinal reaction in- duced by chemotherapeutic agents,and compare them with those of kytril. Methods A randomized,self-crossover control trial was performed. All eligible patients were randomized into AB or BA group. The patients in AB group were treated by nasea in the first cycle and kytril in the second cycle,those in BA group were treated with the reverse order. Results In 43 patients enrolled in the study, 40 were evaluable for response. Nasea was significantly superior to kytril in the control of anorexia(70% vs 47. 5 % ) in the 12 hour period and nausea(57. 5 % vs 37. 5 % ) in the 24 hour period,P0. 05. In the control of vomiting in the 24 hour pe- riod,no statistical difference between the two drugs was observed but the response rate of nausea(75 %) was higher than that of kytril (55%) . The side effects of nausea were headache, feeling of head heaviness, dry month and fatigue,etc. All of these were mild and comparable with kytril in their frequencies. Conclusion Nausea can effectively prevent the gastrointestinal reaction in- duced by chemotherapeutic agents. It is superior to kytril in the control of anorexia and nausea. The side effects of nausea are mild.

Key concepts: Nausea, Vomiting, Anorexia, Medicine, Crossover study, Anesthesia, Chemotherapy, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nausea in the prophylaxis of gastrointestinal reaction induced by chemotherapy — Research Paper | ScholarLens