2008Journal of clinical researchRequires access

Observation on the Efficacy of Three Medicines on Rapid Atrial Fibrillation in Emergency Department

Qian Zhao-xin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

【Objective】To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous diltiazem,amiodarone and cedilanid for the treatment of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in emergency department.【Methods】A total of 83 patients with rapid atrial fibrillation were randomized into 3 groups.Cedilanid group(n=24) were treated with intravenous 0.4mg cedilanid and repeated in 20min if heart rate(HR) 100bpm.Diltiazem group(n=31) were treated with intravenous 10mg diltiazem and repeated in 20min if HR100bpm.Amiodarone group(n=28) were treated with intravenous 150mg amiodarone and repeated in 20min if HR100bpm.【Results】The total efficacies were 75 %,93.5 % and 92.8 % in the cedilanid group,diltiazem group and amiodarone group,respectively.Mean time response to the bolus was 40.1±10.3,8.9±2.5 and 14.1±8.7 minutes,respectively.Two patients in diltiazem group and 2 patients in amiodarone group had asymptomatic hypotension.No patient developed worsening of congestive heart failure due to diltiazem.【Conclusion】Intravenous diltiazem or amiodarone is more effective than cedilanid in quickly decreasing of rapid ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

【Objective】To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous diltiazem,amiodarone and cedilanid for the treatment of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in emergency department.【Methods】A total of 83 patients with rapid atrial fibrillation were randomized into 3 groups.Cedilanid group(n=24) were treated with intravenous 0.4mg cedilanid and repeated in 20min if heart rate(HR) 100bpm.Diltiazem group(n=31) were treated with intravenous 10mg diltiazem and repeated in 20min if HR100bpm.Amiodarone group(n=28) were treated with intravenous 150mg amiodarone and repeated in 20min if HR100bpm.【Results】The total efficacies were 75 %,93.5 % and 92.8 % in the cedilanid group,diltiazem group and amiodarone group,respectively.Mean time response to the bolus was 40.1±10.3,8.9±2.5 and 14.1±8.7 minutes,respectively.Two patients in diltiazem group and 2 patients in amiodarone group had asymptomatic hypotension.No patient developed worsening of congestive heart failure due to diltiazem.【Conclusion】Intravenous diltiazem or amiodarone is more effective than cedilanid in quickly decreasing of rapid ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

【Objective】To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous diltiazem,amiodarone and cedilanid for the treatment of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in emergency department.【Methods】A total of 83 patients with rapid atrial fibrillation were randomized into 3 groups.Cedilanid group(n=24) were treated with intravenous 0.4mg cedilanid and repeated in 20min if heart rate(HR) 100bpm.Diltiazem group(n=31) were treated with intravenous 10mg diltiazem and repeated in 20min if HR100bpm.Amiodarone group(n=28) were treated with intravenous 150mg amiodarone and repeated in 20min if HR100bpm.【Results】The total efficacies were 75 %,93.5 % and 92.8 % in the cedilanid group,diltiazem group and amiodarone group,respectively.Mean time response to the bolus was 40.1±10.3,8.9±2.5 and 14.1±8.7 minutes,respectively.Two patients in diltiazem group and 2 patients in amiodarone group had asymptomatic hypotension.No patient developed worsening of congestive heart failure due to diltiazem.【Conclusion】Intravenous diltiazem or amiodarone is more effective than cedilanid in quickly decreasing of rapid ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Key concepts: Diltiazem, Amiodarone, Medicine, Atrial fibrillation, Anesthesia, Heart failure, Cardiology, Emergency department

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Observation on the Efficacy of Three Medicines on Rapid Atrial Fibrillation in Emergency Department — Research Paper | ScholarLens