The Relationship between The Book of Changes and Confucius in the eye of Qian Mu
Liao Ming
Abstract
Liao Ming
Abstract
The opinion that Confucius had nothing with The Book of Changes was firstly and systematically put forward by Qian Mu. Before that, one scholar in Japan had the same saying. According to the recordings of silk books in Mawangdui and slips of bamboo for writings in the Chu Period, the opinion that Confucius had nothing with The Book of Changes was obviously wrong.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The opinion that Confucius had nothing with The Book of Changes was firstly and systematically put forward by Qian Mu. Before that, one scholar in Japan had the same saying. According to the recordings of silk books in Mawangdui and slips of bamboo for writings in the Chu Period, the opinion that Confucius had nothing with The Book of Changes was obviously wrong.
Key concepts: Nothing, Period (music), Philosophy, Literature, History, Art, Epistemology, Aesthetics