2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam in the Treatment of Chest Postoperative Infection

Ma Hai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate cefoperazone/sulbactam′s therapeutic value in the treatment of chest postoperative infection. METHODS From 49 patients with lower respiratory tract or thoracic cavity infection after chest operation andyzeal retrospectively, 32 patients were treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam. RESULTS Most lower respiratory tract and thoracic cavity infection after chest operation were caused by Gram negative conditioned pathogen, the sensitive rate of these pathogenic bacilli to cefoperazone/sulbactam was 81.58%, and the resistance rate was 7.89%, there was no evident difference with imipenem (P0.05), but had significantly difference with other antibiotics in drug sensitivity experiment (P0.05). The overall effective rate of cefoperazone/sulbactam was 93.75% in clinics. CONCLUSIONS Cefoperazone/sulbactam was worth recommending to use in patients with lower respiratory tract or thoracic cavity infection after chest operation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To evaluate cefoperazone/sulbactam′s therapeutic value in the treatment of chest postoperative infection. METHODS From 49 patients with lower respiratory tract or thoracic cavity infection after chest operation andyzeal retrospectively, 32 patients were treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam. RESULTS Most lower respiratory tract and thoracic cavity infection after chest operation were caused by Gram negative conditioned pathogen, the sensitive rate of these pathogenic bacilli to cefoperazone/sulbactam was 81.58%, and the resistance rate was 7.89%, there was no evident difference with imipenem (P0.05), but had significantly difference with other antibiotics in drug sensitivity experiment (P0.05). The overall effective rate of cefoperazone/sulbactam was 93.75% in clinics. CONCLUSIONS Cefoperazone/sulbactam was worth recommending to use in patients with lower respiratory tract or thoracic cavity infection after chest operation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate cefoperazone/sulbactam′s therapeutic value in the treatment of chest postoperative infection. METHODS From 49 patients with lower respiratory tract or thoracic cavity infection after chest operation andyzeal retrospectively, 32 patients were treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam. RESULTS Most lower respiratory tract and thoracic cavity infection after chest operation were caused by Gram negative conditioned pathogen, the sensitive rate of these pathogenic bacilli to cefoperazone/sulbactam was 81.58%, and the resistance rate was 7.89%, there was no evident difference with imipenem (P0.05), but had significantly difference with other antibiotics in drug sensitivity experiment (P0.05). The overall effective rate of cefoperazone/sulbactam was 93.75% in clinics. CONCLUSIONS Cefoperazone/sulbactam was worth recommending to use in patients with lower respiratory tract or thoracic cavity infection after chest operation.

Key concepts: Cefoperazone, Sulbactam, Medicine, Antibiotics, Lower respiratory tract infection, Respiratory tract, Internal medicine, Thoracoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam in the Treatment of Chest Postoperative Infection — Research Paper | ScholarLens