2004•Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

A randomized multicenter clinical study of cefpodoxime proxetil tablets in treatment of acute bacterial infections in 158 patients

Xiao Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablets in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. METHODS: A randomized multicenter clinical study was conducted for comparing domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablets with inported cefpodoxime proxetil tablets. Both were administered orally at a dose of 100 mg twice daily for 7 to 14 days. RESULTS: Altogether, 175 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them 158 patients were eligible for clinical efficacy analysis inclnding 77 in domestic cefpodoxime proxetil proxetil group, 81 in control group. The cure rates and effective rates were 70 % and 92 %in domestic cefpodoxime proxetil group; and 79 % and 94 %in control group, respectively. The bacterial eradication rates were 98 % and 98 %, respectively. There were no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups. Adverse reactions were observed for 9 % and 2 % of patients in the two groups, dominated by thirsty, nausea, abdominal discomfort and elevated transaminases. CONCLUSION: Domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablet is effective and safe for the treatment of acute bacterial infections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablets in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. METHODS: A randomized multicenter clinical study was conducted for comparing domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablets with inported cefpodoxime proxetil tablets. Both were administered orally at a dose of 100 mg twice daily for 7 to 14 days. RESULTS: Altogether, 175 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them 158 patients were eligible for clinical efficacy analysis inclnding 77 in domestic cefpodoxime proxetil proxetil group, 81 in control group. The cure rates and effective rates were 70 % and 92 %in domestic cefpodoxime proxetil group; and 79 % and 94 %in control group, respectively. The bacterial eradication rates were 98 % and 98 %, respectively. There were no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups. Adverse reactions were observed for 9 % and 2 % of patients in the two groups, dominated by thirsty, nausea, abdominal discomfort and elevated transaminases. CONCLUSION: Domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablet is effective and safe for the treatment of acute bacterial infections.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablets in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. METHODS: A randomized multicenter clinical study was conducted for comparing domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablets with inported cefpodoxime proxetil tablets. Both were administered orally at a dose of 100 mg twice daily for 7 to 14 days. RESULTS: Altogether, 175 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them 158 patients were eligible for clinical efficacy analysis inclnding 77 in domestic cefpodoxime proxetil proxetil group, 81 in control group. The cure rates and effective rates were 70 % and 92 %in domestic cefpodoxime proxetil group; and 79 % and 94 %in control group, respectively. The bacterial eradication rates were 98 % and 98 %, respectively. There were no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups. Adverse reactions were observed for 9 % and 2 % of patients in the two groups, dominated by thirsty, nausea, abdominal discomfort and elevated transaminases. CONCLUSION: Domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablet is effective and safe for the treatment of acute bacterial infections.

Key concepts: Cefpodoxime, Medicine, Ceftizoxime, Internal medicine, Nausea, Clinical efficacy, Adverse effect, Randomized controlled trial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A randomized multicenter clinical study of cefpodoxime proxetil tablets in treatment of acute bacterial infections in 158 patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens