2008•Journal of Practical Hand SurgeryRequires access

Comparison study for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with two methods

Wei-dong Bai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical results of internal fixation with T-shaped plate and closed reduction with application of plaster in treatment of unstable distal radius fractures.Methods A total of 96 patients(103 cases) with unstable distal radius fractures during March 2002 to March 2007 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Among them 42 patients (45 sides) were treated by internal fixation with T-shaped plate, and the others by closed reduction and external fixation with plaster.Results All patients were followed up with the average 33.5 months (range 12 to 63months). According to the Dienst criteria, the excellent and good rate in plate internal fixation group was 86.67%, of which the type A2 A3 is 92.31% and type B C is 84.38%. On the other hand, the number in group of closed reduction and external fixation is 71%,88.20%,63.40% respectively. Furthermore, the difference between type A2 A3 in two groups has no statistically significance (P 0.05),however, it has statistically significance between type B C in two groups(P 0.05).Conclusion No statistical difference between these two methods in treating the type A2 A3 fractures was found. However, the outcome is better in the T-shaped plate internal fixation group than in the closed reduction and external fixation group to type B C fractures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical results of internal fixation with T-shaped plate and closed reduction with application of plaster in treatment of unstable distal radius fractures.Methods A total of 96 patients(103 cases) with unstable distal radius fractures during March 2002 to March 2007 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Among them 42 patients (45 sides) were treated by internal fixation with T-shaped plate, and the others by closed reduction and external fixation with plaster.Results All patients were followed up with the average 33.5 months (range 12 to 63months). According to the Dienst criteria, the excellent and good rate in plate internal fixation group was 86.67%, of which the type A2 A3 is 92.31% and type B C is 84.38%. On the other hand, the number in group of closed reduction and external fixation is 71%,88.20%,63.40% respectively. Furthermore, the difference between type A2 A3 in two groups has no statistically significance (P 0.05),however, it has statistically significance between type B C in two groups(P 0.05).Conclusion No statistical difference between these two methods in treating the type A2 A3 fractures was found. However, the outcome is better in the T-shaped plate internal fixation group than in the closed reduction and external fixation group to type B C fractures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical results of internal fixation with T-shaped plate and closed reduction with application of plaster in treatment of unstable distal radius fractures.Methods A total of 96 patients(103 cases) with unstable distal radius fractures during March 2002 to March 2007 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Among them 42 patients (45 sides) were treated by internal fixation with T-shaped plate, and the others by closed reduction and external fixation with plaster.Results All patients were followed up with the average 33.5 months (range 12 to 63months). According to the Dienst criteria, the excellent and good rate in plate internal fixation group was 86.67%, of which the type A2 A3 is 92.31% and type B C is 84.38%. On the other hand, the number in group of closed reduction and external fixation is 71%,88.20%,63.40% respectively. Furthermore, the difference between type A2 A3 in two groups has no statistically significance (P 0.05),however, it has statistically significance between type B C in two groups(P 0.05).Conclusion No statistical difference between these two methods in treating the type A2 A3 fractures was found. However, the outcome is better in the T-shaped plate internal fixation group than in the closed reduction and external fixation group to type B C fractures.

Key concepts: Internal fixation, Medicine, Statistical significance, Surgery, Fixation (population genetics), Statistical analysis, Radial fractures, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison study for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with two methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens