2011•Hainan Yixueyuan xuebaoRequires access

Two different treatments for distal radius fractures

Zhang Wen-bin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of two treatment of unstable distal radius fractures: distal radial(oblique) T-shaped bone plate fixation and external fixation.Methods: Clinical data of 68 cases with unstable distal radius fractures admitted from June 2006 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed,including 26 cases treated by plate fixation,and 19 cases treated by external fixation.The excellent and good rate were compared.Results: The result of follow-up for 6 to 28 months,with an average of 18.5 months showed that in plate fixation group the excellent and good rate was 81.8% in A type,77.7% in B type and 50.0% in C type;while the rate was100%,100.0%,75.0% and 69.2% in type A,B,C,respectively in external fixation group.There was no significant difference in B type(P 0.05),but significant in C type(P0.05).Conclusions: There is no difference in excellent and good rate for type B,but for type C,external fixation group is more effective than plate fixation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the effect of two treatment of unstable distal radius fractures: distal radial(oblique) T-shaped bone plate fixation and external fixation.Methods: Clinical data of 68 cases with unstable distal radius fractures admitted from June 2006 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed,including 26 cases treated by plate fixation,and 19 cases treated by external fixation.The excellent and good rate were compared.Results: The result of follow-up for 6 to 28 months,with an average of 18.5 months showed that in plate fixation group the excellent and good rate was 81.8% in A type,77.7% in B type and 50.0% in C type;while the rate was100%,100.0%,75.0% and 69.2% in type A,B,C,respectively in external fixation group.There was no significant difference in B type(P 0.05),but significant in C type(P0.05).Conclusions: There is no difference in excellent and good rate for type B,but for type C,external fixation group is more effective than plate fixation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of two treatment of unstable distal radius fractures: distal radial(oblique) T-shaped bone plate fixation and external fixation.Methods: Clinical data of 68 cases with unstable distal radius fractures admitted from June 2006 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed,including 26 cases treated by plate fixation,and 19 cases treated by external fixation.The excellent and good rate were compared.Results: The result of follow-up for 6 to 28 months,with an average of 18.5 months showed that in plate fixation group the excellent and good rate was 81.8% in A type,77.7% in B type and 50.0% in C type;while the rate was100%,100.0%,75.0% and 69.2% in type A,B,C,respectively in external fixation group.There was no significant difference in B type(P 0.05),but significant in C type(P0.05).Conclusions: There is no difference in excellent and good rate for type B,but for type C,external fixation group is more effective than plate fixation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Fixation (population genetics), External fixation, Surgery, Significant difference, Clinical efficacy, Radial fractures, RADIUS

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two different treatments for distal radius fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens