2009•Modern hospitalRequires access

THE COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF CYSTATIN C WITH UREA AND SCR IN PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY FUNCTION DETERMINATION

LI Shuanwen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To discuss the value using serum Cystatinc C and Urea,Scr for kidney function indexes.Methods Using the method of CysC and Urea,Scr to analyse results of kidney function determination,to compare of positive rate.Results The positive rate,including the test of CysC and Urea,Scr,were 17.06%,4.60%,2.00%(male group) and 18.89%,3.32%,3.19%(female group),respectively.In CysC positive cases,the positive rate of Urea and Scr were 17.00%,10.00%(male group) and 7.00%,4.00%(female group) respectively.In the positive cases of three determination indexes,diseased group were higher than those of the control(2.68 to 3.98 times).In patients with hypertension,positive rate of CysC and Urea,Scr were 22.08%,12.66%,9.76%(male group) and 26.25%,8.49%,2.00%,(female group) respectively.Conclusion For the diagnosis of renal damage in early stage,sensitivity of serum CysC is better in combined comparison.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To discuss the value using serum Cystatinc C and Urea,Scr for kidney function indexes.Methods Using the method of CysC and Urea,Scr to analyse results of kidney function determination,to compare of positive rate.Results The positive rate,including the test of CysC and Urea,Scr,were 17.06%,4.60%,2.00%(male group) and 18.89%,3.32%,3.19%(female group),respectively.In CysC positive cases,the positive rate of Urea and Scr were 17.00%,10.00%(male group) and 7.00%,4.00%(female group) respectively.In the positive cases of three determination indexes,diseased group were higher than those of the control(2.68 to 3.98 times).In patients with hypertension,positive rate of CysC and Urea,Scr were 22.08%,12.66%,9.76%(male group) and 26.25%,8.49%,2.00%,(female group) respectively.Conclusion For the diagnosis of renal damage in early stage,sensitivity of serum CysC is better in combined comparison.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To discuss the value using serum Cystatinc C and Urea,Scr for kidney function indexes.Methods Using the method of CysC and Urea,Scr to analyse results of kidney function determination,to compare of positive rate.Results The positive rate,including the test of CysC and Urea,Scr,were 17.06%,4.60%,2.00%(male group) and 18.89%,3.32%,3.19%(female group),respectively.In CysC positive cases,the positive rate of Urea and Scr were 17.00%,10.00%(male group) and 7.00%,4.00%(female group) respectively.In the positive cases of three determination indexes,diseased group were higher than those of the control(2.68 to 3.98 times).In patients with hypertension,positive rate of CysC and Urea,Scr were 22.08%,12.66%,9.76%(male group) and 26.25%,8.49%,2.00%,(female group) respectively.Conclusion For the diagnosis of renal damage in early stage,sensitivity of serum CysC is better in combined comparison.

Key concepts: Cystatin C, Urea, Renal function, Creatinine, Internal medicine, Medicine, Urology, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF CYSTATIN C WITH UREA AND SCR IN PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY FUNCTION DETERMINATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens