2008Zhongguo xin yao zazhiRequires access

A random,blinded and controlled trial for evaluating the efficacy and safety of olanzapine and lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania

Tan Yunlong

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of olanzapine with those of lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania.Methods:Sixty inpatients with bipolar or mixed type mania were treated to olanzapine or lithium in a 4-week random,blinded and controlled trial.To assess the efficacy and side effects, Clinical Global Impression-BP(CGI-S-BP),Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS),Brief Psychosis Rating Scale (BPRS),and Montgomery-(?)sberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS)were used before and after treatment for 1, 2,3,4 weeks.The changes of biochemical index,blood tests,urine tests and electrocardiogram were determined before and at the end of treatments.Results:After treatment with olanzapine or lithium for 4 week,the scores of CGI-S-BP were significantly decreased from(5.4±0.77)and(5.1±0.70)to(2.2±1.21)and(2.3±1.10) (P0.01);YMRS from(33.5±8.13)and(31.6±7.69)to(7.6±10.09)and(6.7±6.79)(P0.01); BPRS from(13.5±7.41)and(14.5±9.20)to(3.8±6.53)and(3.9±4.92)(P0.01).However,there were no significant difference between the effects of two drugs(P0.05).After 6-week treatment of olanzapine and lithium,the respond rate(85.7% and 84.4%)and remission rate(82.1% and 81.3%)were similar.There was no significant difference in TEAEs between two groups,and no abnormalities of electrocardiogram were found in olanzapine group.Conclusion:The efficacy of olanzapine is the same as that of lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania,but its safety is higher.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of olanzapine with those of lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania.Methods:Sixty inpatients with bipolar or mixed type mania were treated to olanzapine or lithium in a 4-week random,blinded and controlled trial.To assess the efficacy and side effects, Clinical Global Impression-BP(CGI-S-BP),Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS),Brief Psychosis Rating Scale (BPRS),and Montgomery-(?)sberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS)were used before and after treatment for 1, 2,3,4 weeks.The changes of biochemical index,blood tests,urine tests and electrocardiogram were determined before and at the end of treatments.Results:After treatment with olanzapine or lithium for 4 week,the scores of CGI-S-BP were significantly decreased from(5.4±0.77)and(5.1±0.70)to(2.2±1.21)and(2.3±1.10) (P0.01);YMRS from(33.5±8.13)and(31.6±7.69)to(7.6±10.09)and(6.7±6.79)(P0.01); BPRS from(13.5±7.41)and(14.5±9.20)to(3.8±6.53)and(3.9±4.92)(P0.01).However,there were no significant difference between the effects of two drugs(P0.05).After 6-week treatment of olanzapine and lithium,the respond rate(85.7% and 84.4%)and remission rate(82.1% and 81.3%)were similar.There was no significant difference in TEAEs between two groups,and no abnormalities of electrocardiogram were found in olanzapine group.Conclusion:The efficacy of olanzapine is the same as that of lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania,but its safety is higher.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of olanzapine with those of lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania.Methods:Sixty inpatients with bipolar or mixed type mania were treated to olanzapine or lithium in a 4-week random,blinded and controlled trial.To assess the efficacy and side effects, Clinical Global Impression-BP(CGI-S-BP),Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS),Brief Psychosis Rating Scale (BPRS),and Montgomery-(?)sberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS)were used before and after treatment for 1, 2,3,4 weeks.The changes of biochemical index,blood tests,urine tests and electrocardiogram were determined before and at the end of treatments.Results:After treatment with olanzapine or lithium for 4 week,the scores of CGI-S-BP were significantly decreased from(5.4±0.77)and(5.1±0.70)to(2.2±1.21)and(2.3±1.10) (P0.01);YMRS from(33.5±8.13)and(31.6±7.69)to(7.6±10.09)and(6.7±6.79)(P0.01); BPRS from(13.5±7.41)and(14.5±9.20)to(3.8±6.53)and(3.9±4.92)(P0.01).However,there were no significant difference between the effects of two drugs(P0.05).After 6-week treatment of olanzapine and lithium,the respond rate(85.7% and 84.4%)and remission rate(82.1% and 81.3%)were similar.There was no significant difference in TEAEs between two groups,and no abnormalities of electrocardiogram were found in olanzapine group.Conclusion:The efficacy of olanzapine is the same as that of lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania,but its safety is higher.

Key concepts: Young Mania Rating Scale, Olanzapine, Mania, Clinical Global Impression, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Bipolar disorder, Lithium (medication), Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A random,blinded and controlled trial for evaluating the efficacy and safety of olanzapine and lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania — Research Paper | ScholarLens