2012•Clinical Medicine & EngineeringRequires access

Analysis of Locking Plate and Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Comminuted Fractures

Wang Qiqun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the clinical curative effect of locking plate and humeral head replacement in the treatment of proximal humerus comminuted fractures. Methods 30 patients with proximal humerus comminuted fractures in our hospital from July 2007 to December 2010 were randomly divided into two groups. The replacement group received the humeral head replacement, and the fixed group received the locking proximal humeral plate for internal fixation. The shoulder activity degree and shoulder joint function of two groups were observed. Results ①Shoulder activity degree: The abduction and lateral rotation of the shoulder in the replacement group were better than those in the fixed group, and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05); There was no statistical difference in the anteflexion between two groups (P 0.05). ② Shoulder joint function: The curative effect in the replacement group were better than the fixed group, and the difference wasstatistically significant (P 0.05); There were no statistical differences in Cleaning the contralateral armpit and taking the weight index between two groups (P 0.05). Conclusions For patients' activity ability, humeral head replacement has better curative effect than locking plate, which can improve the patients' self-care ability and performance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the clinical curative effect of locking plate and humeral head replacement in the treatment of proximal humerus comminuted fractures. Methods 30 patients with proximal humerus comminuted fractures in our hospital from July 2007 to December 2010 were randomly divided into two groups. The replacement group received the humeral head replacement, and the fixed group received the locking proximal humeral plate for internal fixation. The shoulder activity degree and shoulder joint function of two groups were observed. Results ①Shoulder activity degree: The abduction and lateral rotation of the shoulder in the replacement group were better than those in the fixed group, and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05); There was no statistical difference in the anteflexion between two groups (P 0.05). ② Shoulder joint function: The curative effect in the replacement group were better than the fixed group, and the difference wasstatistically significant (P 0.05); There were no statistical differences in Cleaning the contralateral armpit and taking the weight index between two groups (P 0.05). Conclusions For patients' activity ability, humeral head replacement has better curative effect than locking plate, which can improve the patients' self-care ability and performance.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the clinical curative effect of locking plate and humeral head replacement in the treatment of proximal humerus comminuted fractures. Methods 30 patients with proximal humerus comminuted fractures in our hospital from July 2007 to December 2010 were randomly divided into two groups. The replacement group received the humeral head replacement, and the fixed group received the locking proximal humeral plate for internal fixation. The shoulder activity degree and shoulder joint function of two groups were observed. Results ①Shoulder activity degree: The abduction and lateral rotation of the shoulder in the replacement group were better than those in the fixed group, and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05); There was no statistical difference in the anteflexion between two groups (P 0.05). ② Shoulder joint function: The curative effect in the replacement group were better than the fixed group, and the difference wasstatistically significant (P 0.05); There were no statistical differences in Cleaning the contralateral armpit and taking the weight index between two groups (P 0.05). Conclusions For patients' activity ability, humeral head replacement has better curative effect than locking plate, which can improve the patients' self-care ability and performance.

Key concepts: Medicine, Proximal humerus, Shoulder joint, Humerus, Surgery, External rotation, Internal fixation, Shoulder Fracture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Locking Plate and Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Comminuted Fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens