2013•The Orthopedic Journal of ChinaRequires access

The clinical efficacy of locking plate versus humeral head prosthesis for treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures

Zeng Mian-dong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Objective]To comparate and analyse the short-term clinical efficacy of locking plates and humeral head prosthesis for proximal humeral complicated fractures.[Method]The retrospective data of 61 cases deal with locking plate or humeral head prosthesis replacement for treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures were collected from January 2009 to June 2011 in our hospital.According to Neer classification,they were part three and part four fractures.Deal with locking plate(n=35),part three fractures of proximal humeral were(n=23)and part four(n=12),Deal with humeral head prosthesis replacement(n=26),part three fractures ofproximal humeral were(n=5) and part four(n=21).The operative time,blood loss and a one-time cost of hospitalization were contrasted between two groups,and the curative effect was also evaluated according to Neer scoring system.[Result] In the internal fixation group: the mean operative time was 60 ± 5 min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 300 ± 10ml,and the disposable hospital average cost was $ 37 940±3 500.In the replacement group: the mean operative time was 50 ± 5 min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 350 ± 20ml,and the disposable hospital average cost was $ 38 850±4 800.The follow up was ranging from 12 to 36 months(mean,20.5months).Assessed by Neer scoring system,The rate of excellent and good results was 86.2% in locking plate group,no significance was found to humeral head prosthesis group 90%(P0.05).[Conclusion]Locking plate and humeral head prosthesis in the treatment of proximal humerus comminuted fracture were similar in the operative time,intraoperative blood,disposable hospital average cost,and both of them were able to achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome.Two choics of surgical approach depend on the screening of the correct indications.The locking plate fixation is the best option to the person who is young and is able to reach intraoperative repositioning.The humeral head prosthesis is the best choice to the old person with severely comminuted proximal humerus fractures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Objective]To comparate and analyse the short-term clinical efficacy of locking plates and humeral head prosthesis for proximal humeral complicated fractures.[Method]The retrospective data of 61 cases deal with locking plate or humeral head prosthesis replacement for treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures were collected from January 2009 to June 2011 in our hospital.According to Neer classification,they were part three and part four fractures.Deal with locking plate(n=35),part three fractures of proximal humeral were(n=23)and part four(n=12),Deal with humeral head prosthesis replacement(n=26),part three fractures ofproximal humeral were(n=5) and part four(n=21).The operative time,blood loss and a one-time cost of hospitalization were contrasted between two groups,and the curative effect was also evaluated according to Neer scoring system.[Result] In the internal fixation group: the mean operative time was 60 ± 5 min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 300 ± 10ml,and the disposable hospital average cost was $ 37 940±3 500.In the replacement group: the mean operative time was 50 ± 5 min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 350 ± 20ml,and the disposable hospital average cost was $ 38 850±4 800.The follow up was ranging from 12 to 36 months(mean,20.5months).Assessed by Neer scoring system,The rate of excellent and good results was 86.2% in locking plate group,no significance was found to humeral head prosthesis group 90%(P0.05).[Conclusion]Locking plate and humeral head prosthesis in the treatment of proximal humerus comminuted fracture were similar in the operative time,intraoperative blood,disposable hospital average cost,and both of them were able to achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome.Two choics of surgical approach depend on the screening of the correct indications.The locking plate fixation is the best option to the person who is young and is able to reach intraoperative repositioning.The humeral head prosthesis is the best choice to the old person with severely comminuted proximal humerus fractures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Objective]To comparate and analyse the short-term clinical efficacy of locking plates and humeral head prosthesis for proximal humeral complicated fractures.[Method]The retrospective data of 61 cases deal with locking plate or humeral head prosthesis replacement for treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures were collected from January 2009 to June 2011 in our hospital.According to Neer classification,they were part three and part four fractures.Deal with locking plate(n=35),part three fractures of proximal humeral were(n=23)and part four(n=12),Deal with humeral head prosthesis replacement(n=26),part three fractures ofproximal humeral were(n=5) and part four(n=21).The operative time,blood loss and a one-time cost of hospitalization were contrasted between two groups,and the curative effect was also evaluated according to Neer scoring system.[Result] In the internal fixation group: the mean operative time was 60 ± 5 min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 300 ± 10ml,and the disposable hospital average cost was $ 37 940±3 500.In the replacement group: the mean operative time was 50 ± 5 min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 350 ± 20ml,and the disposable hospital average cost was $ 38 850±4 800.The follow up was ranging from 12 to 36 months(mean,20.5months).Assessed by Neer scoring system,The rate of excellent and good results was 86.2% in locking plate group,no significance was found to humeral head prosthesis group 90%(P0.05).[Conclusion]Locking plate and humeral head prosthesis in the treatment of proximal humerus comminuted fracture were similar in the operative time,intraoperative blood,disposable hospital average cost,and both of them were able to achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome.Two choics of surgical approach depend on the screening of the correct indications.The locking plate fixation is the best option to the person who is young and is able to reach intraoperative repositioning.The humeral head prosthesis is the best choice to the old person with severely comminuted proximal humerus fractures.

Key concepts: Medicine, Prosthesis, Blood loss, Surgery, Fixation (population genetics), Internal fixation, Clinical efficacy, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical efficacy of locking plate versus humeral head prosthesis for treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens