2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Efficacy of PICC and Subclavian Vein Catheter in Coma Patients with Brain Injury

Lin Yanqu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To discuss the therapy efficacy of peripherally inserted central catheter( PICC) and subclavian vein catheter in coma patients with brain injury. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of coma patients with brain injury,in which 79 cases with PICC and 63 cases with subclavian vein catheter. The disposable catheter success rate and the incidence of catheter- related complications were compared in the two groups. Results A disposable catheter success rate of 94. 9%( 75 /79) in the PICC group,and 74. 5%( 47 /63) in the subclavian vein catheter group,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). The incidence of mechanical phlebitis and catheter blockage in the PICC group were more than the subclavian vein catheter group( P 0. 05),and the incident of catheter off and unplanned catheter removal were less( P 0. 05). The incidence of catheter malposition,catheter related infections in these two groups was no statistically significant( P 0. 05). Conclusions The PICC and subclavian vein catheter used in the coma patients with brain injury has the advantages of simple,convenient nursing,long indwelling time. By comparison,the PICC has mire has more advantages.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To discuss the therapy efficacy of peripherally inserted central catheter( PICC) and subclavian vein catheter in coma patients with brain injury. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of coma patients with brain injury,in which 79 cases with PICC and 63 cases with subclavian vein catheter. The disposable catheter success rate and the incidence of catheter- related complications were compared in the two groups. Results A disposable catheter success rate of 94. 9%( 75 /79) in the PICC group,and 74. 5%( 47 /63) in the subclavian vein catheter group,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). The incidence of mechanical phlebitis and catheter blockage in the PICC group were more than the subclavian vein catheter group( P 0. 05),and the incident of catheter off and unplanned catheter removal were less( P 0. 05). The incidence of catheter malposition,catheter related infections in these two groups was no statistically significant( P 0. 05). Conclusions The PICC and subclavian vein catheter used in the coma patients with brain injury has the advantages of simple,convenient nursing,long indwelling time. By comparison,the PICC has mire has more advantages.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To discuss the therapy efficacy of peripherally inserted central catheter( PICC) and subclavian vein catheter in coma patients with brain injury. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of coma patients with brain injury,in which 79 cases with PICC and 63 cases with subclavian vein catheter. The disposable catheter success rate and the incidence of catheter- related complications were compared in the two groups. Results A disposable catheter success rate of 94. 9%( 75 /79) in the PICC group,and 74. 5%( 47 /63) in the subclavian vein catheter group,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). The incidence of mechanical phlebitis and catheter blockage in the PICC group were more than the subclavian vein catheter group( P 0. 05),and the incident of catheter off and unplanned catheter removal were less( P 0. 05). The incidence of catheter malposition,catheter related infections in these two groups was no statistically significant( P 0. 05). Conclusions The PICC and subclavian vein catheter used in the coma patients with brain injury has the advantages of simple,convenient nursing,long indwelling time. By comparison,the PICC has mire has more advantages.

Key concepts: Medicine, Catheter, Subclavian vein, Surgery, Coma (optics), Incidence (geometry), Anesthesia, Vein

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of PICC and Subclavian Vein Catheter in Coma Patients with Brain Injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens