Survey on status of China's scientific journals
Peiyi Liu
Abstract
Peiyi Liu
Abstract
Based on a survey to relevant experts in physics(including mechanics and astronomy),we analyzed the status of China's scientific journals.Survey results show that Chinese researchers are generally dissatisfied with scientific journals published in China,and the lack of high-level manuscripts and adverse-oriented science evaluation policy are main restricting factors for the development of China's scientific journals.Moreover,we propose a series of development initiatives for China's scientific journals,such as creating a group of high-quality journals and improving research assessment system,etc.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Based on a survey to relevant experts in physics(including mechanics and astronomy),we analyzed the status of China's scientific journals.Survey results show that Chinese researchers are generally dissatisfied with scientific journals published in China,and the lack of high-level manuscripts and adverse-oriented science evaluation policy are main restricting factors for the development of China's scientific journals.Moreover,we propose a series of development initiatives for China's scientific journals,such as creating a group of high-quality journals and improving research assessment system,etc.
Key concepts: China, Quality (philosophy), Political science, Library science, Computer science, Physics, Law, Quantum mechanics