2013Chinese Journal of DisinfectionRequires access

OBSERVATION ON THE in vitro DISINFECTION EFFECT OF A RAPID HAND ANTISEPTIC

MA Ling-ping

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the actual disinfection effect of a rapid hand antiseptic.Methods The in vitro disinfection test was used to compare the actual disinfection effect of this rapid hand antiseptic with povidone iodine.Results There was no bacteria detected in samples of four times(immediate,60min,120min,180min) from two groups whose hands exposed to the rapid hand antiseptic and povidone iodine respectively.There was no case of skin erythema or dropsy and rash while 3 cases of itching were found in the experiment group including 200 people exposed to this rapid hand disinfection antiseptic.The adverse reaction rate was 1.5%(3/200) in experiment group and that was 6% in control group(povidone iodine group).Conclusion The disinfection effects of a rapid hand antiseptic and povidone iodine on hands of medical staff have no difference and there is no bacteria after disinfection.But there are quick dry skin and low adverse reaction rate after disinfection with a rapid hand antiseptic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the actual disinfection effect of a rapid hand antiseptic.Methods The in vitro disinfection test was used to compare the actual disinfection effect of this rapid hand antiseptic with povidone iodine.Results There was no bacteria detected in samples of four times(immediate,60min,120min,180min) from two groups whose hands exposed to the rapid hand antiseptic and povidone iodine respectively.There was no case of skin erythema or dropsy and rash while 3 cases of itching were found in the experiment group including 200 people exposed to this rapid hand disinfection antiseptic.The adverse reaction rate was 1.5%(3/200) in experiment group and that was 6% in control group(povidone iodine group).Conclusion The disinfection effects of a rapid hand antiseptic and povidone iodine on hands of medical staff have no difference and there is no bacteria after disinfection.But there are quick dry skin and low adverse reaction rate after disinfection with a rapid hand antiseptic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the actual disinfection effect of a rapid hand antiseptic.Methods The in vitro disinfection test was used to compare the actual disinfection effect of this rapid hand antiseptic with povidone iodine.Results There was no bacteria detected in samples of four times(immediate,60min,120min,180min) from two groups whose hands exposed to the rapid hand antiseptic and povidone iodine respectively.There was no case of skin erythema or dropsy and rash while 3 cases of itching were found in the experiment group including 200 people exposed to this rapid hand disinfection antiseptic.The adverse reaction rate was 1.5%(3/200) in experiment group and that was 6% in control group(povidone iodine group).Conclusion The disinfection effects of a rapid hand antiseptic and povidone iodine on hands of medical staff have no difference and there is no bacteria after disinfection.But there are quick dry skin and low adverse reaction rate after disinfection with a rapid hand antiseptic.

Key concepts: Antiseptic, Erythema, Medicine, Adverse effect, Iodine, Surgery, Chemistry, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
OBSERVATION ON THE in vitro DISINFECTION EFFECT OF A RAPID HAND ANTISEPTIC — Research Paper | ScholarLens