Experimental study of aggregation and activation in pooled buffy coat-derived and apheresis platelets
Jinghan Liu
Abstract
Jinghan Liu
Abstract
Objective To investigate the difference of aggregation and activation in vitro between pooled buffy coat-derived and apheresis platelets. Methods The platelets were divided into two groups: the pooled buffy coat-derived platelet group and the apheresis platelet group. Platelet aggregation response to ADP in the two groups were detected by APACT2 aggregometry. Activation markers CD62p and PAC-1 on platelets in the two groups were measured by flow cytometry. Results The aggregation response to ADP of platelets in two groups were (84.1±9.0)% vs (87.9±11.1)%(P0.05). The level of activation markers CD62p and PAC-1 on the membranes of platelets in two groups were CD62p (13.4±4.6%, 11.6±2.9%; P0.05) and PAC-1(9.3±3.7%, 8.1±2.9%; P0.05). Conclusions It shows no significant difference of aggregation response to ADP and the level of activation between buffy coat-derived and apheresis platelets.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the difference of aggregation and activation in vitro between pooled buffy coat-derived and apheresis platelets. Methods The platelets were divided into two groups: the pooled buffy coat-derived platelet group and the apheresis platelet group. Platelet aggregation response to ADP in the two groups were detected by APACT2 aggregometry. Activation markers CD62p and PAC-1 on platelets in the two groups were measured by flow cytometry. Results The aggregation response to ADP of platelets in two groups were (84.1±9.0)% vs (87.9±11.1)%(P0.05). The level of activation markers CD62p and PAC-1 on the membranes of platelets in two groups were CD62p (13.4±4.6%, 11.6±2.9%; P0.05) and PAC-1(9.3±3.7%, 8.1±2.9%; P0.05). Conclusions It shows no significant difference of aggregation response to ADP and the level of activation between buffy coat-derived and apheresis platelets.
Key concepts: Buffy coat, Platelet, Apheresis, Platelet activation, Flow cytometry, Medicine, Platelet aggregation, Significant difference