1995PlateletsRequires access

A Comparative Study in Volunteers of Apheresis and Buffy Coat Derived Platelets

S. G. Mitchell, V. S. Turner, R J Hawker, A Mead

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

It is important that, at the time of transfusion, platelets prepared by different techniques are effective in vivo and meet acceptable criteria. A paired study was undertaken in 8 volunteer donors to compare apheresis platelets collected on the COBE Spectra with platelets derived from the buffy coat of whole blood donations after 5 days storage. In vivo recovery, survival and biodistribution were determined following indium-111 labelling of the platelets and autologous infusion into volunteers together with the in vitro evaluation of platelet function and biochemistry. The in vivo and in vitro characteristics of both types of platelet concentrate were not significantly different. Both products were equally viable after 5 d storage and both were of an acceptable quality as judged by currently used platelet products. Mean platelet survival (multiple hit) was 5.4 d for the apheresis platelets and 6.9 d for the buffy coat derived platelets and maximum recovery in circulation was 28.1% and 34.8%, respectively. There was a significantly higher platelet yield, as expected, from apheresis and a 1.5 log lower level of white cell contamination. This would be advantageous for patients in need of prolonged or recurrent transfusions as the number of donor exposures and the risk of alloimmunisation or viral transmission would be reduced.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is important that, at the time of transfusion, platelets prepared by different techniques are effective in vivo and meet acceptable criteria. A paired study was undertaken in 8 volunteer donors to compare apheresis platelets collected on the COBE Spectra with platelets derived from the buffy coat of whole blood donations after 5 days storage. In vivo recovery, survival and biodistribution were determined following indium-111 labelling of the platelets and autologous infusion into volunteers together with the in vitro evaluation of platelet function and biochemistry. The in vivo and in vitro characteristics of both types of platelet concentrate were not significantly different. Both products were equally viable after 5 d storage and both were of an acceptable quality as judged by currently used platelet products. Mean platelet survival (multiple hit) was 5.4 d for the apheresis platelets and 6.9 d for the buffy coat derived platelets and maximum recovery in circulation was 28.1% and 34.8%, respectively. There was a significantly higher platelet yield, as expected, from apheresis and a 1.5 log lower level of white cell contamination. This would be advantageous for patients in need of prolonged or recurrent transfusions as the number of donor exposures and the risk of alloimmunisation or viral transmission would be reduced.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is important that, at the time of transfusion, platelets prepared by different techniques are effective in vivo and meet acceptable criteria. A paired study was undertaken in 8 volunteer donors to compare apheresis platelets collected on the COBE Spectra with platelets derived from the buffy coat of whole blood donations after 5 days storage. In vivo recovery, survival and biodistribution were determined following indium-111 labelling of the platelets and autologous infusion into volunteers together with the in vitro evaluation of platelet function and biochemistry. The in vivo and in vitro characteristics of both types of platelet concentrate were not significantly different. Both products were equally viable after 5 d storage and both were of an acceptable quality as judged by currently used platelet products. Mean platelet survival (multiple hit) was 5.4 d for the apheresis platelets and 6.9 d for the buffy coat derived platelets and maximum recovery in circulation was 28.1% and 34.8%, respectively. There was a significantly higher platelet yield, as expected, from apheresis and a 1.5 log lower level of white cell contamination. This would be advantageous for patients in need of prolonged or recurrent transfusions as the number of donor exposures and the risk of alloimmunisation or viral transmission would be reduced.

Key concepts: Buffy coat, Platelet, Apheresis, In vivo, Medicine, Blood product, Platelet transfusion, Whole blood

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Study in Volunteers of Apheresis and Buffy Coat Derived Platelets — Research Paper | ScholarLens