2004Linchuang xiaoer waike zazhiRequires access

Diagnosis Significance of MRU in Ureteral Obstruction of Children

Zhi Tan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare and evaluate diagnostic role of various imaging manifestation in the urinary tract obstruction. Methods 23 cases with urinary tract obstruction underwent B-ultrasound scanning, intravenous phelography(IVP), retrograde urography, CT scanning and magnetic resonance urography (MRU), and their findings were compared. Results B-ultrasound showed hydronephrosis in 15 cases of them, IVP provide for poor renal image in 7 cases. CT showed hydronephrosis in all 8 examined cases. MRU produced a good image in all cases. Conclusions Both B-ultrasound and IVP can be used as a first choice imaging for diagnosis of ureteral obstruction, MRU has the advantages of non-invasiveness, no ionizing radiation and could show the nonfunctional renal collecting tubules system.So it has important diagnotic value in congenital urinary tract obstruction of children.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare and evaluate diagnostic role of various imaging manifestation in the urinary tract obstruction. Methods 23 cases with urinary tract obstruction underwent B-ultrasound scanning, intravenous phelography(IVP), retrograde urography, CT scanning and magnetic resonance urography (MRU), and their findings were compared. Results B-ultrasound showed hydronephrosis in 15 cases of them, IVP provide for poor renal image in 7 cases. CT showed hydronephrosis in all 8 examined cases. MRU produced a good image in all cases. Conclusions Both B-ultrasound and IVP can be used as a first choice imaging for diagnosis of ureteral obstruction, MRU has the advantages of non-invasiveness, no ionizing radiation and could show the nonfunctional renal collecting tubules system.So it has important diagnotic value in congenital urinary tract obstruction of children.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare and evaluate diagnostic role of various imaging manifestation in the urinary tract obstruction. Methods 23 cases with urinary tract obstruction underwent B-ultrasound scanning, intravenous phelography(IVP), retrograde urography, CT scanning and magnetic resonance urography (MRU), and their findings were compared. Results B-ultrasound showed hydronephrosis in 15 cases of them, IVP provide for poor renal image in 7 cases. CT showed hydronephrosis in all 8 examined cases. MRU produced a good image in all cases. Conclusions Both B-ultrasound and IVP can be used as a first choice imaging for diagnosis of ureteral obstruction, MRU has the advantages of non-invasiveness, no ionizing radiation and could show the nonfunctional renal collecting tubules system.So it has important diagnotic value in congenital urinary tract obstruction of children.

Key concepts: Medicine, Hydronephrosis, Pyelogram, Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging, Urinary system, Radiology, Urinary tract obstruction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnosis Significance of MRU in Ureteral Obstruction of Children — Research Paper | ScholarLens